against male reproductive rights? Every time the topic of male reproductive rights comes up here on this board we see women that try to justify the current "women only" system that's currently in place.
What's fascinating is that these women don't seem to understand that every argument they use against men gaining reproductive rights is equally applicable to women.
These women are unknowingly condemning abortion.
They say things like "The man shouldn't have had sex" and "The man should've used a condom."
Well, that argument works on women too, so I guess we can make abortion illegal now because the women should've known better.
No? You want to keep abortion? You like having the ability to legally opt out of parenthood?
Duely noted.
The second argument that is also applicable to women is where men should have to be indentured servants because of the "it's for the child" reasoning.
Now, this one is even more ridiculous due to the fact that when women abort their child... that's not really the best thing for that child, now is it?
So again... if you really stand by your argument that if it's not the best thing for the child, then it's not right... then I guess you want to kiss abortion goodbye again.
No? You still want to hold onto it?
Fascinating.
So if women are guilty of the same things men are (knowing better and acting in their own self interests before the interests of the child) ...Then why should women and women alone be given the right to legally opt out of parenthood?
Another fascinating thing is that the word "responsibility" doesn't even enter the picture when it comes to female reproductive rights and it wouldn't even matter if it did... Because women already have those rights.
Funny how the word "responsibility" enters the conversation every time there's a discussion about men wish to opt out of parenthood.
Every single time.
Men have to be "responsible" for something that women can legally legally terminate or legally abandon.
Is this really the way our laws should work?
What's fascinating is that these women don't seem to understand that every argument they use against men gaining reproductive rights is equally applicable to women.
These women are unknowingly condemning abortion.
They say things like "The man shouldn't have had sex" and "The man should've used a condom."
Well, that argument works on women too, so I guess we can make abortion illegal now because the women should've known better.
No? You want to keep abortion? You like having the ability to legally opt out of parenthood?
Duely noted.
The second argument that is also applicable to women is where men should have to be indentured servants because of the "it's for the child" reasoning.
Now, this one is even more ridiculous due to the fact that when women abort their child... that's not really the best thing for that child, now is it?
So again... if you really stand by your argument that if it's not the best thing for the child, then it's not right... then I guess you want to kiss abortion goodbye again.
No? You still want to hold onto it?
Fascinating.
So if women are guilty of the same things men are (knowing better and acting in their own self interests before the interests of the child) ...Then why should women and women alone be given the right to legally opt out of parenthood?
Another fascinating thing is that the word "responsibility" doesn't even enter the picture when it comes to female reproductive rights and it wouldn't even matter if it did... Because women already have those rights.
Funny how the word "responsibility" enters the conversation every time there's a discussion about men wish to opt out of parenthood.
Every single time.
Men have to be "responsible" for something that women can legally legally terminate or legally abandon.
Is this really the way our laws should work?