T
Twilight
Guest
...important than change? This seems to be a common feature, not just of protest movements but attitudes to life in general.
Taking a non gender debate:
Global warming doesn't exists.
Then it exists, but wasn't man made.
Then it is man made (or affected by us), but we can't change our habits.
Then it's too late.
On gender arguments, it seems that many times people agree that there's a problem, and after that the energy is not spent on how to fix it, but on whos fault it is.
For example, men protest that child custody is "unfair" but do we want more access, do we want to pay less support...easy to see the problem, easy to dish out blame. Not so easy to solve.
And what about unequal punishment for the same crime. Do we want to see women punished more? Or men being rehabilitated as mras claim women are? Again easy to see the problem, easy to assign blame. Hard to find a solution.
It's not at all unique to the mens movement, it seems to plague every political and social organization.
Noam Chomsky made an interesting point. He said (roughly) - when I go to Rwanda, scene of famine, violence, terrible deprivation, the people there tell me what they are doing about it. they don't ask how they can help. They are not paralyzed into helplessness. They know the obstacles they must overcome. They are acting to overcome them.
Yet we in the west seem to suffer under different delusions. We have come to believe that we cannot change things.
Joel Straczynski, the Sci Fi writer wrote "Oh people can change things, things change all the time. It's a matter of who is making the changes, and why."
For the mens movement in particular, what are the challenges. Are we complaining in order simply to blame? Is assigning blame more important than affecting change?
Taking a non gender debate:
Global warming doesn't exists.
Then it exists, but wasn't man made.
Then it is man made (or affected by us), but we can't change our habits.
Then it's too late.
On gender arguments, it seems that many times people agree that there's a problem, and after that the energy is not spent on how to fix it, but on whos fault it is.
For example, men protest that child custody is "unfair" but do we want more access, do we want to pay less support...easy to see the problem, easy to dish out blame. Not so easy to solve.
And what about unequal punishment for the same crime. Do we want to see women punished more? Or men being rehabilitated as mras claim women are? Again easy to see the problem, easy to assign blame. Hard to find a solution.
It's not at all unique to the mens movement, it seems to plague every political and social organization.
Noam Chomsky made an interesting point. He said (roughly) - when I go to Rwanda, scene of famine, violence, terrible deprivation, the people there tell me what they are doing about it. they don't ask how they can help. They are not paralyzed into helplessness. They know the obstacles they must overcome. They are acting to overcome them.
Yet we in the west seem to suffer under different delusions. We have come to believe that we cannot change things.
Joel Straczynski, the Sci Fi writer wrote "Oh people can change things, things change all the time. It's a matter of who is making the changes, and why."
For the mens movement in particular, what are the challenges. Are we complaining in order simply to blame? Is assigning blame more important than affecting change?