D
Decapitated Cat Head
Guest
While there are many women who are independent and have jobs, there is a larger swath of women who work very low paid jobs and who has no ambition, yet expect a house and food given to them for years and decades, without wanting to work.
I personally know of them, and I noticed that this mentality has a higher frequency of this type of thought pattern the more attractive the girl is.
We all know that a woman has a CHOICE into if she wants a career or to stay home, while men have NO choice and MUST have a career to survive. We all know that men will take care of women (financially support them) but women will not financially support men (or if they do, a infinitesmal frequency to vice versa).
Why is this? How did society reach the point where the man works his ass off at risk of getting divorced later (half of salary in crippling HARD WORK garnished), while the woman lives it easy at home waking up as she chooses? How did MEN have to work and WOMEN don't have to work and feel entitled not to work.
I believe the ROOT is that men have a LARGER sex drive then women, and desire sex more. Men don't refuse sex, women do, or hold it to make the guy pay or work for it, in ways that is a lot like prostitution, but not official prostitution like escort services or street corner prostitution. Men will take care of a woman because of his higher desire for sex, while women will NOT financially support men, which is why MEN HAVE TO GET A CAREER OR BE HOMELESS.
What role do you think the disparity of sex drive has in shaping gender roles?
What about the men who are natural nurturers/multitaskers and who dont' want to be the sole provider, but a dual provider?
THERE ARE A LOT OF MEN who don't want to be the provider, because it can be used against him in divorce court if the wife files for divorce ALL ON HER OWN with the husband not wanting it. So that's my reasoning for not wanting to be a provider. There are a lot of lazy men bums too, are they providers. It's not fair for one to be the provider and for the other to not be the provider. Because then one is giving and then one is taking. And if the wife files for divorce on her own, it continues for a LONG LONG time if not indefinitely forever. I am writing this right now as I'm developing a web application (front-end and back-end), and I would be incredibly angry if I had no salary/compensation because a future wife of mine divorced me on her own.
*reasons for why I don't want to be a sole provider.
Both should work. All able-bodied adults should work. Why should I work and somebody else shouldn't work?
I personally know of them, and I noticed that this mentality has a higher frequency of this type of thought pattern the more attractive the girl is.
We all know that a woman has a CHOICE into if she wants a career or to stay home, while men have NO choice and MUST have a career to survive. We all know that men will take care of women (financially support them) but women will not financially support men (or if they do, a infinitesmal frequency to vice versa).
Why is this? How did society reach the point where the man works his ass off at risk of getting divorced later (half of salary in crippling HARD WORK garnished), while the woman lives it easy at home waking up as she chooses? How did MEN have to work and WOMEN don't have to work and feel entitled not to work.
I believe the ROOT is that men have a LARGER sex drive then women, and desire sex more. Men don't refuse sex, women do, or hold it to make the guy pay or work for it, in ways that is a lot like prostitution, but not official prostitution like escort services or street corner prostitution. Men will take care of a woman because of his higher desire for sex, while women will NOT financially support men, which is why MEN HAVE TO GET A CAREER OR BE HOMELESS.
What role do you think the disparity of sex drive has in shaping gender roles?
What about the men who are natural nurturers/multitaskers and who dont' want to be the sole provider, but a dual provider?
THERE ARE A LOT OF MEN who don't want to be the provider, because it can be used against him in divorce court if the wife files for divorce ALL ON HER OWN with the husband not wanting it. So that's my reasoning for not wanting to be a provider. There are a lot of lazy men bums too, are they providers. It's not fair for one to be the provider and for the other to not be the provider. Because then one is giving and then one is taking. And if the wife files for divorce on her own, it continues for a LONG LONG time if not indefinitely forever. I am writing this right now as I'm developing a web application (front-end and back-end), and I would be incredibly angry if I had no salary/compensation because a future wife of mine divorced me on her own.
*reasons for why I don't want to be a sole provider.
Both should work. All able-bodied adults should work. Why should I work and somebody else shouldn't work?