K
Kazuki-san
Guest
Requesting Downloads is NOT Allowed
This really isn't the place to debate this, but if that's what you want.. Grokster vs MGM deals with whether Grokster can be held accountable for copyright infringment of their users, since Grokster did not actually cause the infringment to occur, the users did so themselves. Grokster may not be held liable, but individual users are completely liable if they infringe upon copyrights. The Betamax case was the same. Betamax couldn't be held responsible for any infringments created because someone who owned a Betamax copied a tape. The end user is very much liable, however. Like I said earlier, don't confuse something being illegal with someone knocking on your door trying to take you to jail, but it's illegal all the same.
Edo said:Please follow the Grokster vs MGM case. Think 1984 Betamax ruling...
This really isn't the place to debate this, but if that's what you want.. Grokster vs MGM deals with whether Grokster can be held accountable for copyright infringment of their users, since Grokster did not actually cause the infringment to occur, the users did so themselves. Grokster may not be held liable, but individual users are completely liable if they infringe upon copyrights. The Betamax case was the same. Betamax couldn't be held responsible for any infringments created because someone who owned a Betamax copied a tape. The end user is very much liable, however. Like I said earlier, don't confuse something being illegal with someone knocking on your door trying to take you to jail, but it's illegal all the same.