Do Horror Movies Scare You Anymore?

It's okay:) In that case I pretty much agree with you.

What movies did I find fit into that category?
Do you mean in the category I mentioned in my post which aren't necessarily classified as 'horror' films?

If you do then I suppose David Lynch's 'Blue Vevet' which I found incredibly tense the first time I saw it, and I just didn't know what disturbing thing would happen next.

The film that had the most dramatic effect on me the first time I saw it was the uncensored uncut 'Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer'. It actually had a physical effect on me where my legs went numb and I felt really funny. My brain was telling me that it was just a fictional film, but it felt so authentic that my mind was telling me it was a snuff movie and it was wrong for me to be watching it.

I think that the films that truly give me a scare are the ones that have scenes in them that suddenly provide the disturbingly unexpected situations that you can't predict are going to happen, and you also can't predict how the scene will end or where it will go.........THAT'S what gets me.
It may not be necessarily the entire film that I find scary, but just scenes that POP out at me.

Stuff that springs to mind right now...
Scenes from the films I mentioned above (In no particular order):

1) In 'Blue Velvet' the scene of the boy hiding in the wardrobe as Frank is abusing the nightclub singer and using a gasmask. Really harrowing tense stuff. Generally disturbingly scary/creepy film overall in it's style.

2) 'Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer' - Most prominent scene was Henry and Otis watching the video of themselves killing a family. REALLY nasty stuff that got my heart pumping and my legs feeling numb. Very harrowing.
The opening scenes of the camera floating across several murdered women in various positions of death felt bad as well as it all felt so real.

Other stuff from films that are categorized in the horror genre:

3) 'Candyman' - Was very effective in places. The scariest scene for me was when Virginia MaRABen suddenly found herself transported into a kitchen where she is covered in blood and there's blood all over the kitchen floor and the noise of a baby crying can be heard.
This had an effect on me because the scene just happened for no apparent rhyme or reason how she got there, what was going on, and what was going to happen next.

4) 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre' - The scene where the Grandpa cannibal is trying to smash the girl's head in with a hammer over the bucket. He keeps failing to do it right or dropping the hammer, and each time the hammer is put into his hand to try again and again. I just didn't know how it would end or when it would end. Seriously disturbing. Just incredibly inventive film making'

5) 'The Shining' - Again, several scenes here.
The two twin girls, the old woman getting out of the bath. It had many scenes which were both disturbingly shocking, or scary in the spooky supernatural sense.

6) 'The Thing' - I love John Carpenter films and he's excellent at providing tension based horror. This film I thought was especially good because you just don't know what's going to happen next or how nasty it's going to be.

There's many other examples I could post from various films, but these spring to mind for me right now.

The things that scare me and are evident in all the scenes I mention above is The Unexpected.
1) You don't see how it got to the scene.
2) You can't rationalise it. You can't figure out how what or why it's happening.
3) You can't see how the scene will end.

I think that if you can't see an escape route then you've got the potential for good horror.
Those appear to be three rules that seem to have a good chance of having the potential to scare me.
Because fear to me is being suddenly thrown into a situation with no rhyme or reason and having no clue how to get out of it or why it's even happening. Something where the horror appears to have no beginning, middle, or end.

Poor horror to me is the formula stuff, Often typified by cliched scenes of having a shot set up where the camera is on a character, but there's an expanse of space behind them to either the left or the right where you just know that somebody is going to predictably pop up to occupy that space. Often a character will just stand in front of a window (sometimes a window that's been boarded up with wooden slats) when you know that's a stupid thing to do when there's something outside trying to get them.
It feels lazy and contrived and it's film making by numbers. Won't scare me because you can predict what's going to happen and if you can predict that much you can be pretty certain that any end to the scene will be pretty formulaic and predictable too.

Maybe the formula to good horror is to ironically avoid the familiar formulas as much as possible. Because often it's the very formulas that they use to try to get the horror that in themselves kill any chance of horror.
 
Like you,I was totally creeped out by The Ring and The Grudge,both the Asian originals and the remakes.But then there are several other similar and copycat films that just don't do anything for me at all.

Horror films as a whole I very rarely find scary any more because everything has been done to death ( is that a great pun or what?:D:rolleyes:),It's now more the occasional scene that gets me but as a genre,most horror films are pretty predictable.

Of all the horror film situations though,the one that will most give me goosebumps are ghosts.

The thing I absolutely hate about a lot of horror films is the staged thunderstorms,where you can actually HEAR the lightning.It is just an insult to the intelligence and I have to mute the sound and fast forward the film during those ridiculous scenes.
 
I used to love watching horror movies, they would keep my attention all the way through. Nowadays though, they all seem to be a re hash of something else & that's becoming an issue, I think.

I really enjoyed Wolf Creek & was pretty gripped by it, I like the fact nothing happened for 45 minutes, the remake of Hills Have Eyes was the same. I think I'm kinda scared of being in trouble & there's not a soul around. That creeps me out :eek:

I loved the first Scream movie. The opening scene where Drew Barrymore is babysitting & the killer keeps creeping her out, eventually chasing her out of the house. I can't watch it now since I live on my own & don't like the idea of someone watching me!!

I can't remember the last horror movie I really liked though.
 
I just don't think they can be that scary anymore because we know how things are done more with special effects etc.

Some ghost stories and things to do with the devil can be quite chilling :p
 
Scream is a pretty good example, actually. I thought that beginning of that movie especially, was quite nerve-wracking in itself. The sequels though, just seemed to copy it and it never got any better. They just used old ideas and re-wrote the story.

The new Halloween is supposed to be far more scarier than the original, and more bloody. For good gore horror fans this is not bad, but for some people, who want pure terror and to want to walk away with a feeling of having to look over your shoulder, it might be a let down. Luckily, Halloween is the one case in which I think I will be watching purely for the blood and gore. :)

Does anyone think that as you get older, it becomes harder and harder to be scared from a horror movie?
 
Wow, I have seen most of those movies, and I found them to be the one lot I can actually enjoy as a horror movie, even though some of them are not classed as such.

The Shining ~ I would proudly say was a very good movie. I had only seen it four years ago, believe it or not. :o I don't know why it took me so long to see it, but it unnerved me a little because I chose to watch it in the dark, and while I was alone. It did the job though, and the scene in the bathroom... I have to say it both scared the bejebus out of me and grossed me out a little.

Candyman ~ good movie in all. Didn't go much for the sequels though, I have to say. The first movie, I think I saw that back in 2001, maybe 2002. :o I will have to get that and watch it again.

Texas Chainsaw Massacre ~ I assume you meant the original. The original was scariest for me, not the new one, but that could be because I already knew how it was going to end, kind of. The first film was the first of it's type that I had watched, it is just a shame none of the others that came after (most recently Wrong Turn etc) cannot live up to it's brilliance.

The Thing ~ Absolutely brilliant movie. A good alien film with some decent sfx, which didn't need computers, as usual. The scene with the dogs and the head with spider legs, freaked the hell out of me. A good movie, one I have on DVD and intend to watch at the weekend now. :)

I will have to check out Blue Velvet, and Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer, believe it or not I haven't seen them. I will most certainly check out those movies though, and watch some of the others again sometime, when I can get the order in from Amazon mainly. :D

I think I am done with formula movies for a while, although it is so hard to tell what is formula and what is decent horror when they claim so much on the box and tagline, and you don't really know what the movie is like until you have seen it. Some of them even look alright in the aRAB, until you actually watch the movie.
 
it might not be possible for some people, but try watching the scary movie home alone in the dark. it might help bring back the jitters.
 
most horror movies these days tend to be funny in my opinion.
although i did see an odd film few weeks ago.
dead scilence.
was good
any1 else see it?
thought it was really good.
 
I think one of the factors in what makes a film scary is where the director/writer puts the audience in the heirarchy of who knows what's going on.

Tension is created when the audience is given some information that the character on screen isn't given - i.e. we know he/she's in danger but he/she doesn't - we know where the killer/monster is but he/she doesn't.

Shock is created when we aren't given that information, and we're in the same position as the character on screen. The Thing is a good example of this. The audience is as ignorant as the guys on screen - except we do have the advantage of knowing it's a horror film, so we know something bad's going to happen but we don't know what it will be.

Blue Velvet is a great example of this kind of positioning of the audience. We know more about what's going on than Sandy (Laura Dern) but less than Jeffrey (Kyle MacLachlan), and he knows less about what's going than Dorothy Vallens and she knows less than Frank Booth. So we're pretty low down on the list. The thing about David Lynch films is that the audience is always left knowing less than the lead character.
 
Please do check out Blue Velvet and Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer. But don't bother with Henry 2 - it's absolutely rubbish. Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer was very cheap in the shops a while back.
If you haven't seen it already I thoroughly recommend the original Night of the Living Dead for a film that turns conventions on their head. You can usually find it for
 
Didn't think a lot of either Henry films.
Loved Blue Velvet and have seen it a few times.
Horror doesn't scare me but I did enjoy 1408 and would watch it again.
I like watching the old "video nasties" just to laugh at how stupid the censors were back in the 80's, I would love to know what those people would make of movies like Hostel and Saw . LOL
 
I have managed to locate Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer on Amazon, for a decent price and it is the uncut version, so that should be a bonus. I assume THIS is the Blue Velvet you are referring to. :o If so, I am putting my orders through for both them and Night of the Living Dead. Only thing is I have found a few copies of the Night of the Living Dead, one of them 1968 and the other 1990. :o



I have heard this a lot of Blue Velvet, and I am intrigued now to find out if this is the case. I have enjoyed some of David Lynch's movies before, and I think I will enjoy this one, to a certain level that you CAN enjoy creepy movies :)

It's what I want, to be trapped in the nightmare with the lead character on screen, and care about what happens, rather than waiting to see what happens just to get it out of the way. Good storytelling is important.
 
Back
Top