MasterMorte
New member
or is their constant attack on the scientific evidence a result of non-divulged, personal or financial interests?
People with divested interests in not changing carbon emission rates would throw around terms like 'fraud' and 'hoax'. People without divested interests have otherwise bought a lie.
"Climate-Gate" emails might account for 0.01% of the research conducted all over the world in various institutes, and not just a single English University. Whether or not the data was accurate or purposely deleted is irrelevant. There is no fraud or any reason to defraud the sceptics.
People with divested interests in not changing carbon emission rates would throw around terms like 'fraud' and 'hoax'. People without divested interests have otherwise bought a lie.
"Climate-Gate" emails might account for 0.01% of the research conducted all over the world in various institutes, and not just a single English University. Whether or not the data was accurate or purposely deleted is irrelevant. There is no fraud or any reason to defraud the sceptics.