N
novo
Guest
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2010/07/08/federal-court-hands-major-victory-to-gay-couples/
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
D
Diesel66
Guest
except you are wrong. You couldn't MOVE and then get a license in NYC though. But you can drive in that state.
E
eljefedetonto
Guest
hope this starts a rirabroad
on par with the impending oakland rirabroad
on par with the impending oakland rirabroad
R
red
Guest
This is right. What the act says is that for the purposes of federal consideration, marriage can only be between a man and a woman. So if a married couple is entitled to federal benefits, they won't get it if they're nrabroad
a man and a woman.
a man and a woman.
C
CBFryman
Guest
And remove 2 prabroad
ential couples from the gene pool which would be doing such.
However lez couples still often inseminate if they want children instead of adopting.
ential couples from the gene pool which would be doing such.
However lez couples still often inseminate if they want children instead of adopting.
M
mikejet
Guest
Do they choose insemination over adoption?
T
tarmactrr
Guest
I'm all for gays getting married. They should be allowed to be miserable just like hetero couples
R
red
Guest
What does this have to do with anything?
M
mover
Guest
That doesn't answer the question. What line of logic did he use that you found bizarre? To simply say it was novel or bizarre is pointless. What was novel and bizarre about it? It sounded pretty reasonable to me, so I'm trying to understand your side.