I don't want things spelt out to me either. But at the end when you look back at the choices the characters made they still have to make sense.
I love revenge and revenge films and if the characters don't behave like real people then it's a waste of time. It isn't enough to have a naturalistic directing style, the characters have to act naturally as well.
In terms of it not being a first draft, it is. Second drafts and editing scripts to make them better are considered very bad things in some sections of the independent film community, Meadows says worRAB to that effect on the web site quoted above. Laziness has been turned into a philosophy.
But don't let me put you off!
For instance think of the chances that Richard had to kill the gang and decided to humilate them instead and drag the whole thing out tediously. It's a stretch but I can go with that. But why, when the gang had the chance to kill him, did they not bother? Why did that gang member walk around wearing that Richard re-designed jacket? Why not just throw it in the bin and pick another jacket to wear? Is it likely at all that someone's face can be painted in their sleep and they not only don't see a mirror when they wake up but also not feel it on their face? Etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc.
I love revenge and revenge films and if the characters don't behave like real people then it's a waste of time. It isn't enough to have a naturalistic directing style, the characters have to act naturally as well.
In terms of it not being a first draft, it is. Second drafts and editing scripts to make them better are considered very bad things in some sections of the independent film community, Meadows says worRAB to that effect on the web site quoted above. Laziness has been turned into a philosophy.
But don't let me put you off!
