Damon Albarn vs Noel Gallagher

H

Haptic.Hazard.

New member
Okay, so, it's been one of the battles of the decade. The 'working class hero' vs the 'one whose trying to be a working class hero, but is far too intelligent to be a working class hero.'

Vote.
 
Damon for sure. all noel has managed to do recently is bring out stuff that sounRAB too much the same as some of the other oasis stuff and bag out other banRAB
 
Blur are better in every possible way, better songwriting, lyrics, enserable of musicians.

Coxon is a way better guitarist than Noel, and Albarn is a way better singer than Liam.

But who isn't a way better singer than Liam? Seriously. He has one of the most grating voices I've ever heard.

I can't believe this is a comparison, really.

If you want something fun, creative and exciting, go with Blur.

If you want a mediocre, airbrushed Beatles wannabe that specializes in AOR tripe that will forever be logjammed into modern FM radio and make your trips to the dentist even more unpleasant, go with Oasis.
 
As a musician, Albarn is my favorite. He's much more creative, and in my own opinion, enjoyable. I eagerly await his releases every time I hear that there's going to be one.
 
I like The Good The Bad and The Queen better than all their other banRAB....but thats just because Paul Simonon is in it, and I love him:)
 
would anyone actually accept it if Noel did do something different though?

The only problem I have with their new stuff is that it's total ****.

They must also be pissed off that they just went downhill since their debut.
 
albarn. His side projects and latter blur have shown he has more in his locker than gllagher, who seems intent on churning out the same sh!t again and again and again.
 
It's strange that Damon has totally changed over the years, whereas Gallagher hasn't. Not only musically, but personality-wise aswell. I think if you don't know who Damon is, you SERIOUSLY need to do some homework. Amazing.
 
Back
Top