Creationists, besides Earth Sciences, what other research has yielded hundreds

of years of misdirection? If it is only Earth Sciences, in your opinion why have other fields only resulted in better understanding? Is it a difference in methodology?
Borneo, you are misquoting. It isn't "therefore there is no God", it is more like "Therefore Genesis is fictional". And no literal Garden of Eden takes away a literal Adam and Eve, which takes away that particular concept of original sin. Without that original sin... what do we need a Savior for again?
Hey Goat, get a clue and learn some reading comprehension. Maybe read between the lines a little. I don't think many people mistake me for being religious.
 
If creationsists ever engaged in rational thinking they would get kicked out of the creationist cult club house. Main moto is 'ignorance in all things'.
 
well one, american Creationists are either lazy, or not smart enough to read the hebrew bible or have someone read it to them. In which several things have been lost in translation such as the threee words for hevean, Sky, Stars, and Paradise all in english have the same word. So when it says God seperated the heavens from the heavens, you should interpet it as he slpit the sky and stars apart. And how did he do this? by putting a huge thing of ice around the world, then when god told noah he was going to make it rain, Noah said "What is rian," the tide had alwaysed watered the plants, so when it rained, god got rid of the layer of ice, that forced thousands of layers of earth to churn and now they still do chrun.
 
Back
Top