You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Cover Wars No 1
- Thread starter eyJude
- Start date
the vocals are more interesting on oasis's version but they missed the point of doing a cover, it sounRAB like what the beatles wouldve done if they had better recording equipment, i pick the beatles just because i cant stand live recordings except for supersonic that's actually pretty good
Margo Lane
New member
It hurts to choose Oasis over The Beatles, but in this case the Oasis version has more balls.
Annagram the Eskimoette
New member
I voted The Beatles
sushifishiez
New member
I don't see what's so great about turning one of the coolest and trippiest songs of all time into a straightforward pop-rock song.
ms_froggie3718
New member
The Beatles version is the one that does it for me. [it has nothing to do with the fact that i love the beatles]
It should be a trippy psychedlic song, not some britpop sing along.
It should be a trippy psychedlic song, not some britpop sing along.
God you must really hate Oasis then.
I'll go with The Beatles myself, i prefer music over attitude.
I also don't get how The Beatles don't have balls when all they did for the 2nd half of the 60s was experiement, Oasis aren't doing anything new at all, just immitating their idols.... I dont see how it makes them ballsy, it just means that Noel and Liam are VERY unrealistic if they really consider themselves to be on the same level as Lennon and McCartney.
I'll go with The Beatles myself, i prefer music over attitude.
I also don't get how The Beatles don't have balls when all they did for the 2nd half of the 60s was experiement, Oasis aren't doing anything new at all, just immitating their idols.... I dont see how it makes them ballsy, it just means that Noel and Liam are VERY unrealistic if they really consider themselves to be on the same level as Lennon and McCartney.