Ji.ngleberr.ies
New member
You could say anything is a double standard. A bed is a thing, and a plate is a thing. But you don't dollop sauce on a bed, so is that a double standard? They are both "things" after all.
tim: but who decides what is "unrelated" or "prejudicial"?
tim: again though, isn't the perception of "complete" difference dependent on the wording? Say a man and a woman are held to the same standards. This takes as a given that their anatomical differences are not significant enough to warrant different treatment. But what if someone didn't take that as a given? And how would they be wrong, when it's completely subjective?
tim: but who decides what is "unrelated" or "prejudicial"?
tim: again though, isn't the perception of "complete" difference dependent on the wording? Say a man and a woman are held to the same standards. This takes as a given that their anatomical differences are not significant enough to warrant different treatment. But what if someone didn't take that as a given? And how would they be wrong, when it's completely subjective?