The questions and information here challenge the entire scientific community regarding the correctness of the physics and the cosmology developed in the past 150 years or so. It is very hard yet there is no choice but to confront them!
Classic physic led by Galilean physics teaches that matters produce phenomena such as that air produces atmospheric pressure meaning that phenomena have “physical origins”. However, the mathematical theories of Einstein and others teach to use mathematical equations to represent universal phenomena meaning that phenomena have mathematical origins. For example, according to them light is electromagnetic wave or photon, gravity is curved spacetime. The physics of mathematical origins is apparently contradictory with the physics of physical origins and therefore one of them must be wrong.
The question is which one is the correct physics? Since the physical origins such as those of an atmospheric pressure, the sound, and a fire have been proven correct for centuries, should we ask whether they can be represented by any derived mathematical equations? If not, have the mathematical theories of Einstein, Faraday, Maxwell, etc. been disproved?
So far there are widely accepted mathematical theories for light, gravity, other universal forces, particle physics, etc. Yet, there is essentially no coherency and there are even serious contradictions among them! Together, can they be the correct physics?
There can be only one correct natural science that should be coherent and consistent as a whole. Galilean physics has long been the foundation of all fields of natural science meaning that they are consistent and the common-sense physics. Upon repeatedly proven correct for centuries, it should be self event to be the only correct physics except for the long-time failure in finding the physical origins of the universal phenomena. What if the physical origins of all universal phenomena have been found leading to a coherent and consistent interpretation of them and the universe? Since only the correct physics can offer such a comprehensive interpretation of the nature, Galilean physics has to be it. The new discovery is given in the book “Common Sense Physics and Cosmology”, Infinity Publishing.com. and a summary paper is available to anyone requests it([email protected]).
The next question is how to bring our scientific community and government back to real physics and cosmology, the classical Galilean physics? Are they willing to give up the mathematical theories they have been supporting in the past century?
Josef Tsau
Classic physic led by Galilean physics teaches that matters produce phenomena such as that air produces atmospheric pressure meaning that phenomena have “physical origins”. However, the mathematical theories of Einstein and others teach to use mathematical equations to represent universal phenomena meaning that phenomena have mathematical origins. For example, according to them light is electromagnetic wave or photon, gravity is curved spacetime. The physics of mathematical origins is apparently contradictory with the physics of physical origins and therefore one of them must be wrong.
The question is which one is the correct physics? Since the physical origins such as those of an atmospheric pressure, the sound, and a fire have been proven correct for centuries, should we ask whether they can be represented by any derived mathematical equations? If not, have the mathematical theories of Einstein, Faraday, Maxwell, etc. been disproved?
So far there are widely accepted mathematical theories for light, gravity, other universal forces, particle physics, etc. Yet, there is essentially no coherency and there are even serious contradictions among them! Together, can they be the correct physics?
There can be only one correct natural science that should be coherent and consistent as a whole. Galilean physics has long been the foundation of all fields of natural science meaning that they are consistent and the common-sense physics. Upon repeatedly proven correct for centuries, it should be self event to be the only correct physics except for the long-time failure in finding the physical origins of the universal phenomena. What if the physical origins of all universal phenomena have been found leading to a coherent and consistent interpretation of them and the universe? Since only the correct physics can offer such a comprehensive interpretation of the nature, Galilean physics has to be it. The new discovery is given in the book “Common Sense Physics and Cosmology”, Infinity Publishing.com. and a summary paper is available to anyone requests it([email protected]).
The next question is how to bring our scientific community and government back to real physics and cosmology, the classical Galilean physics? Are they willing to give up the mathematical theories they have been supporting in the past century?
Josef Tsau