Circumcision

I'm not concerned about your foreskins themselves. If I were, I would not be unconcerned whether you get circumcised later in life. I'm concerned that you are doing something irreversable to your infants that will affect them the rest of their life with very little to no benefit, and in fact it may be a detriment, even if you ignore that things may go wrong.



I admitted having personal experience with oral sex with an uncircumcised penis and that taste isn't an issue. You put your own interpretation onto that.



Oh? You were uncircumcised and only later were circumsized? If this is not the case then you cannot prefer one way or the other since you have had zero experience with the other.



Since you know no differently, how would you know whether you wouldn't like the other way better? :) You could not even imagine what it would be like to get an idea.

Your attitude in this thread speaks to the lie. It is something you cannot change and had no choice in, and claim you like this better. That seems a desire to validate your difference.



That was an example of denial that some men go through. I see the similarity in how you're behaving, even if you do not.



I see. So, then, you have no criteria other than your own bias.



I don't particularly care whether infant piercings and tatooing were done in sterile conditions and have low risks. It is still absurd and it still has risks. Circumcision does have risks and there is little to no reason to do them. To accept these risks and the damage it could do were the risks realized (and I realize the risk is low, but it is not zero) when there is no measurable benefit is absurd. To do so purely for cosmetic reasons is asnine, imo. I would be making this stink for infant tatooing and ear piercings, too. If they wish any of these things for cosmetic reasons later in life, I fully support it.
 
Would you believe .... a small briefcase?
I recall when I went to my physical for the draft (picture 100 necked men in a room). It was there that I learned that the Declaration of Independence lied .... all men are NOT created equal.
 
That's the beauty of a free society. As a parent, I get to decide what's best for my kiRAB, not you. :xgood:

OK, so you're either gay, bisexual, female or very acrobatic. :wow:

I see. You're another "walk a mile in my shoes" advocate.

LOL. You're making a mountain out of a molehill...or in this instance a little excess foreskin. :)
I don't know about everyone, but I doubt that anyone I know ISN'T circumsized..... and NONE of us grieve the loss of the purple helmet's toque. LOL.


Well Freud, don't quit your day job. I'm not in denial, I just don't get all worked up over extra foreskin. I can even trim my nails and get a haircut without having an emotional breakdown. :rolleyes:

If it's good enough for the Supreme Court, it's good enough for me. :)


Circumcision, like a tonsilectomy, is probably much riskier on an adult patient.
And since you keep saying that there are no health benefits, I decided to check for myself.


So it appears that your assertion that there aren't benefits to circimcision is bogus. :wow:
 
Yes. He could not know how sex is supposed to feel, so why would he know that the circumcision is to blame for a lack in sensation and come to you for answers?
 
Is there any benefit to crooked teeth, and what risks are there with putting braces on him? Are there any downsides with no complications? Any detriment to waiting until he can get it done himself?

The point with circumcision is that there can be benefit to leaving the foreskin on and there is potential risk with this surgery. A botched circumcision can have some damn serious complications even if it's only a maiming. There is precious little reason to do it and there are good reasons not to.

Even with no complications, there is a decrease in sensitivity and a drying/hardening of the head of the penis. Why do that to your son if you do not have to? It makes no sense, especially in light of the ability to get it done later in life.
 
Back
Top