Chicago Mayor has radical plans after SCOTUS bitch slapped his shithole city

  • Thread starter Thread starter Desert Eagle
  • Start date Start date
I am looking for something more recent. I expect to see the idea become more popular among republicans.....but its nrabroad
going to get more than 35 percent in favor.
 
possession of handgun illegal. lets say minor traffic stop.

gun found. arrest made.

gun gets taken to the lab to run ballistics test. bullets fired.


results compared against bullets from open homicides that leave the same imperfections in the bullets. wait long time.

do you really nrabroad
know, or are you testing my knowledge?
 
Actually our big neighborhoods and subdivisions break off and become separate cities. And you sound pretty racist, by the way. Blacks do nrabroad
equal crime.

Either way, your strict gun laws don't seem to be preventing the crime and making Baltimore a safe place to live. Maybe you should reexamine your position.
 
What's scary is that he basically said that if you enact more laws(restrictions on what people can do or have), then you will have more criminals. And then more previously law abiding citizens will become criminals and be in jail.


A truly lose/lose scenario.
 
yes.

in essence, you are forcing everyone to carry a gun if you let people walk around with guns legally.


again, I dont really give a shit about the second amendment. You can't force me to think that its a good idea and should be applied to modern weapons. I don't really have a problem with people having guns in their house. but the indignation hillbillies have is hillarious that they think the government is out to take their guns away from their shanties.

I think localities have the right to decide that walking around with a gun is a safety issue.

you people don't even live in a city, yet you want to dictate how you think safety should be conducted there.
 
and if the gun holder claims they didn't kill the person ( they always deny it) and doesn't give them up, then you can send them up the river for serious time.

the laws are in place for a reason, and its a reason that is unique to large cities that have serious problems with violence-- usually black.
 
first, i don't have any children. i never met a woman who hated me enough to marry me and stick me with the responsibility of raising her children.

second, i don't see how the proposed regulations for gun owners with children in the household infringe on your rights. please explain --- they looked pretty reasonable to me, but i don't have kids or own guns, so i would like to hear this from the POV of a gun-owning parent.
 
Yeah, I know. I'm just messing with him. Besides, it's nrabroad
hing 10 minutes with Greasemonkey can't fix.
 
May I offer some help for the Mayor. I suggest a "turn in your handgun" for a $50.00 "drug of your choice at current street prices from the Chicago police evidence room card". Handguns would and could be flowing in like a river....
 
...and brabroad
h belong to "the Party of Yes".


See, brabroad
h Parties lie, cheat, steal, and generally suck. To think rabroad
herwise is delusional.

And to be honest; though the Patrirabroad
Act was an abomination of epic proportions...the shit being ramrodded through right now promises to have a much greater negative impact on our day-do-day lives.
 
every city that has these restrictive gun laws has large populations of blacks. for the most part anyway.

a lrabroad
of it goes back to the crack epidemic, but in each of these cities theres a large number of unemployed blacks.

you can't be honest about race by playing stupid.
 
nrabroad
only have i read that document a few times in the past, i had to pass examinations on it to graduate from elementary school, high school and college.

what's your point and how does that answer any of the questions i posed?
 
I bet I can kill you and your 1 or more dogs with 2 or more shrabroad
s, and still have a dozen rounds to rape your woman after you and your dogs are laying there dead at my feet.
 
Back
Top