Celtic Stuff
- Thread starter Randomz Type
- Start date
Stop it with the harshness.
It's Larsson and well you know it.
And also he will never be "old hat" he was voted our best foreign player ever.
The bloke is magnificent and a Celtic legend and always will be.
wwe is best
New member
:shifty:
He was rather good it must said - even the Huns wished they had signed him.
mailaccount63
New member
Mr Hex Vision
New member
Winning La Liga twice and the Champions League helped. He set up the winning goal in the final (against Arse if memory serves).
Sir Lex wanting him. Then asking him to come back sort of re-inforces it as well.
Sir Lex wanting him. Then asking him to come back sort of re-inforces it as well.
Ganja ♥ Baby
New member
You're taking it too far now.
YourDarkestRomance
New member
Larson was indeed a world class player but what he was doing at Celtic was a bit of a mystery.
No offence to the those north of the border but the SPL is no where near as strong a league as the premiership. 3 teams through to the champions league semi should prove that. let alone your own admission that to get the golden boot you have to score more goals there.
If the Scottish and English leagues joined where do you think Celtic and rangers would finish at the end of a season?
No offence to the those north of the border but the SPL is no where near as strong a league as the premiership. 3 teams through to the champions league semi should prove that. let alone your own admission that to get the golden boot you have to score more goals there.
If the Scottish and English leagues joined where do you think Celtic and rangers would finish at the end of a season?
sillybilly
New member
No I worked beside one (somebody has to) and he confessed one time he was a jealous as feck of the Hoops having Henrik - I think they had bought Flo at the time for a Brazillion pounds and he didn't think they had got the better deal.
Celtic Charity Fund was officially registered as a recognised charity on March 31, 1996 with the Inland Revenue in Scotland; official Scottish Charity Number SC024648.
aims
Celtic Charity Fund has the following aims:-
1. To raise funds and support specific areas of charity work, selected each year by Celtic Football Club.
2. To uphold and promote the charitable principles and heritage of Celtic Football Club.
Areas of support
Celtic has identified 3 principal and 3 subsidiary areas of support:-
Principal Areas
1. Charities in support of children
<3MommyofACutie&anAngel<3
New member
At the end of 1 season Celtic would be about 12-15.
Within 4 years, tops, Celtic would be competing to win it.
Celtic can turn a profit of millions of pounds with about
Within 4 years, tops, Celtic would be competing to win it.
Celtic can turn a profit of millions of pounds with about
Chocolategirl
New member
To be fair we did pay about
PeoplePerson978
New member
I was reading about the record football attendances today
Rangers 118,567
Celtic 92,000
Manchester City 84,569
Manchester United 83,260
Chelsea 82,905 (apparently 100,000+ attended a Chelsea v dynamo Moscow game after ww2)
I don't doubt that joining the English league would be great for Celtic and rangers. extra tv revenue alone would be a big help. but you still are not in near the top 4 in the premier league for revenue every year.
The world's 20 biggest football clubs in full (2006/07 revenue figures in brackets)
1: Real Madrid (€351.0)
2: Man. United (€315.2)
3: FC Barcelona (€290.1)
4: Chelsea (€283.0)
5: Arsenal (€263.9)
6: AC Milan (€227.2)
7: Bayern Munich (€223.3)
8: Liverpool (€198.9)
9: Internazionale (€195.0)
10: AS Roma (€157.6)
11: Tottenham (€153.1)
12: Juventus (€145.2)
13: Lyon (€140.6)
14: Newcastle Utd (€129.4)
15: Hamburg SV (€120.4)
16: Schalke 04 (€114.3)
17: Celtic (€111.8)
18: Valencia (€107.6)
19: Marseille (€99.0)
20: Werder Bremen (€97.3)
14-15th is a bit pessimistic, i was thinking around 7th - 8th the first year.
Still the debate of where teams would be placed and crowd trouble would make a joined league rather difficult to pull off.
Rangers 118,567
Celtic 92,000
Manchester City 84,569
Manchester United 83,260
Chelsea 82,905 (apparently 100,000+ attended a Chelsea v dynamo Moscow game after ww2)
I don't doubt that joining the English league would be great for Celtic and rangers. extra tv revenue alone would be a big help. but you still are not in near the top 4 in the premier league for revenue every year.
The world's 20 biggest football clubs in full (2006/07 revenue figures in brackets)
1: Real Madrid (€351.0)
2: Man. United (€315.2)
3: FC Barcelona (€290.1)
4: Chelsea (€283.0)
5: Arsenal (€263.9)
6: AC Milan (€227.2)
7: Bayern Munich (€223.3)
8: Liverpool (€198.9)
9: Internazionale (€195.0)
10: AS Roma (€157.6)
11: Tottenham (€153.1)
12: Juventus (€145.2)
13: Lyon (€140.6)
14: Newcastle Utd (€129.4)
15: Hamburg SV (€120.4)
16: Schalke 04 (€114.3)
17: Celtic (€111.8)
18: Valencia (€107.6)
19: Marseille (€99.0)
20: Werder Bremen (€97.3)
14-15th is a bit pessimistic, i was thinking around 7th - 8th the first year.
Still the debate of where teams would be placed and crowd trouble would make a joined league rather difficult to pull off.
blunosepit
New member
who is this jp?
causeimchinese
New member
Quality to the max.
Brother Walfrid was instrumental in setting up the club in the east end of Glasgow. Indeed he is the chap who is considered to have started the whole thing off.
That statue recognises that. In essence without him there would be no Celtic.
There was also a restaurant created within the stadium in his name. I have eaten there on several occasions, including Mrs JP's 40th and number two son's 16th.
That statue recognises that. In essence without him there would be no Celtic.
There was also a restaurant created within the stadium in his name. I have eaten there on several occasions, including Mrs JP's 40th and number two son's 16th.
roofergirlusa
New member
What crowd trouble.
I'm sure the English fans would do their best to behave. They tend to be OK at home, it's just when they go abroad that the problem starts.
Re your assertion, Celtic are roughly 80 million euro behind Liverpool which is around 60 million pounds. That must surely be around what Liverpool would earn in TV money. And also income from every other source would almost certainly increase.
I'm sure the English fans would do their best to behave. They tend to be OK at home, it's just when they go abroad that the problem starts.
Re your assertion, Celtic are roughly 80 million euro behind Liverpool which is around 60 million pounds. That must surely be around what Liverpool would earn in TV money. And also income from every other source would almost certainly increase.