I realize this is probably a little late, but I just had to. I saw New Moon yesterday and I absolutely hated it, like I detest the rest of Twilight (terribly written book, so-so first movie, bad actors, too many close-ups, etc). I have to say this second movie was more of a commercial for Panasonic, Jansport, Canon and Virgin. Nice view of her camera, by the way - why else would the first few scenes only have her and her friends taking pictures of each other - and her ugly schoolbag, and her printer, and the airplane's tail when they take of for Italy? -_-' Commercialism is only feeding today's youth with bad literature!
Next, why does Kirsten Stewart always look angry all the time? The super macro close-ups of the pores and bags under her eyes (I'm not normally one to gossip, but, um, from smoking too much weed before going on set, I presume?) were honestly not necessary. It's not like we felt more related to her in any way. And the vampires were supposed to be pale, not gray.
I hated the part where they went to Italy and the so-called secretary said, "Boo-one pow-merry-gio!" (Buon pomeriggio) in a totally nonconvincing American accent. And that lame wannabe Da Vinci Code scene where they go into an old church with a big dome and something I didn't quite understand happens? Pff. Go read Dan Brown! Read J.K. Rowling! At least there is a link between the stories and nothing is...lame.
And then at the end: "WILL YOU MARRY ME" -> end credits?! WHAT THE HELL. I actually yelled, "This movie sucked!" to the screen. I hate films that don't end properly.
I have nothing against vampires. In fact, I loved Pitt and Cruise and Kiki Dunst in Interview with the Vampire. But something as lame as Twilight... Why do people like it, anyway? Because Robert Pattinson (or Taylor Lautner, whose nose scares me, by the way) is hot?
I'm looking forward to see what you all have to say about this. Please make up some legit counterarguments.
x.
Oh yeah, all Kirsten Stewart is good at is making a complete idiot out of herself screaming her head off in the middle of the night. I felt like throwing popcorn at her because she was so loud.
Next, why does Kirsten Stewart always look angry all the time? The super macro close-ups of the pores and bags under her eyes (I'm not normally one to gossip, but, um, from smoking too much weed before going on set, I presume?) were honestly not necessary. It's not like we felt more related to her in any way. And the vampires were supposed to be pale, not gray.
I hated the part where they went to Italy and the so-called secretary said, "Boo-one pow-merry-gio!" (Buon pomeriggio) in a totally nonconvincing American accent. And that lame wannabe Da Vinci Code scene where they go into an old church with a big dome and something I didn't quite understand happens? Pff. Go read Dan Brown! Read J.K. Rowling! At least there is a link between the stories and nothing is...lame.
And then at the end: "WILL YOU MARRY ME" -> end credits?! WHAT THE HELL. I actually yelled, "This movie sucked!" to the screen. I hate films that don't end properly.
I have nothing against vampires. In fact, I loved Pitt and Cruise and Kiki Dunst in Interview with the Vampire. But something as lame as Twilight... Why do people like it, anyway? Because Robert Pattinson (or Taylor Lautner, whose nose scares me, by the way) is hot?
I'm looking forward to see what you all have to say about this. Please make up some legit counterarguments.
x.
Oh yeah, all Kirsten Stewart is good at is making a complete idiot out of herself screaming her head off in the middle of the night. I felt like throwing popcorn at her because she was so loud.