brilliant_brunette
New member
The problem wasn't a lack of backups, the problem was the backups were stored on the same hard drive as the site.
Since you don't seem to grasp what I was trying to say when I say it pleasantly I will now be less subtle. The side criticism that you don't care about is my MAIN concern, I actually think you are a bit mental having a tantrum like your first post over a bit torrent site that you were not a member of. This is NOT sarcasm it is actually amazement that someone could get that wound up over a torrent site that they were not a member of.Well that doesn't matter, does it (and neither does all the previous stuff in that paragraph which I don't need to quote)...that's a side criticism which I don't care about. All I care(d?) about in this thread is the logical argument we had. Which in the end, you more or less agreed with me in.
Yeah...you see that as a Problem?You...seem to need someone to blame
As I also explained, database control and backup was the job of the coders for the site. If you do feel so strongly about this though maybe you should talk to him directly since this boils your bunny so much. He is staff on other trackers and available on several irc channels on the bend network for you to explain your extreme disappointment.
I can agree to that. :/I agree that the demise of the site was ultimately due to the lack of an off-site backup and as Ca aok suggested there are several ways around this but then hindsight is a marvelous thing, and this is not the first torrent site that closed due to lack of backup and probably won't be the last.
You'd have to find what whatman has said (maybe in his what.cd 2nd anniversary interview). He's sent emails back to rights holders saying there's nothing he's going to do about their complaint because it's not illegal where the site is hosted. It's some technicality - in how the torrent files are stored (or not stored, actually) on the server. i think.Also, to comment on a previous post, while filesharing in Canada is legal, running a tracker is not.
The problem wasn't a lack of backups, the problem was the backups were stored on the same hard drive as the site.
yeah....aka lack of backupsThe problem wasn't a lack of backups, the problem was the backups were stored on the same hard drive as the site.
a vps is a slice of a server, so you can basically host a "small" tracker if you're with those guys.
I highly doubt they would say anything about it anyways.