Australia says "no" to violence, there are signs everywhere that says abuse to government workers will be prosecuted......what about private individuals?
I was originally bullied in my home behind closed doors. The new way to excuse abuse behind closed doors is to allege false medical conditions, while abuse may lead to some medical conditions....it does not do so automatically (Police, Health Workers and the Media are abused daily).
I left this bully in 2001, but now the same person is making false reports through our legal system ... I believe its called systems abuse.
I worked really hard to get to the bottom of what had happened to me. Through FOI documents I discovered one small lie by this individual had been recorded as if it were fact in some records. This organisation then referred the person's lie (exaggerated of course) to others. This led to a range of denied civil rights.
In October 2010 I finally managed to lodge facts to stop the misuse of the legal system and I was denied the right to present it.....and I was threatened as well.
One of the comments made by the Judge was "...I get to decide what evidence is admitted...".
Now while that may be true to a certain extent, I wonder why they decided to keep the hearsay, weight the hearsay, create multiple false records based on the hearsay when there was 8-37 years of medical facts that disputed the lie in 2003?
I referred to section 55 of the Commonwealth Evidence Act which refers to the allowing of evidence which may influence a judicial decision. This bought me 10 minutes to state reasons why my evidence should be admitted. Ten minutes where I was continually cut off when I quoted Australian Legislation and facts they did not want to hear.
I am advised to redress this, I should appeal....these legal people know that appeals cost money and most likely their friends will agree with them anyway.
I think of Justice Einfeld who was appropriately charged and jailed for lying before a judicial proceeding.
Then I think of me....who has been defamed, degraded, denied civil rights, threatened on a lie their own investigators picked up in 2004 (that was recorded and referred for the next 6 years).
How can Justice Einfeld be jailed for simply saying someone else was driving his car, .... while this other individual can say all sorts of lies and walks around freely for the next 6 years still using the system as a form of stalking and abuse (use of a third party to continue abuse)?
What was the lie? "....she has a medical condition..." after he was charged with domestic violence offences (he stalked, threatened and admitted to).
Why have domestic violence laws if when they are enforced the abuser can say whatever he/she likes to destroy and control the other person
Why have domestic violence laws if others go along for the ride, getting paid e$30,000.00 to e$100,000 dollars per year/per lawyer to keep evidence out of the court - is this a good scam and money making scheme or are the legal eagles mentally deficient/under-skilled -
If my case is 8 years long now that's a lot of money per legal eagle, I sacked my lawyer 4 years ago as they refused to present my evidence/witnesses, being on Centrelink I have had to do what I can to present my evidence (I was prevented from doing so for 6 years, that why the catch-up in October 2010)
I was originally bullied in my home behind closed doors. The new way to excuse abuse behind closed doors is to allege false medical conditions, while abuse may lead to some medical conditions....it does not do so automatically (Police, Health Workers and the Media are abused daily).
I left this bully in 2001, but now the same person is making false reports through our legal system ... I believe its called systems abuse.
I worked really hard to get to the bottom of what had happened to me. Through FOI documents I discovered one small lie by this individual had been recorded as if it were fact in some records. This organisation then referred the person's lie (exaggerated of course) to others. This led to a range of denied civil rights.
In October 2010 I finally managed to lodge facts to stop the misuse of the legal system and I was denied the right to present it.....and I was threatened as well.
One of the comments made by the Judge was "...I get to decide what evidence is admitted...".
Now while that may be true to a certain extent, I wonder why they decided to keep the hearsay, weight the hearsay, create multiple false records based on the hearsay when there was 8-37 years of medical facts that disputed the lie in 2003?
I referred to section 55 of the Commonwealth Evidence Act which refers to the allowing of evidence which may influence a judicial decision. This bought me 10 minutes to state reasons why my evidence should be admitted. Ten minutes where I was continually cut off when I quoted Australian Legislation and facts they did not want to hear.
I am advised to redress this, I should appeal....these legal people know that appeals cost money and most likely their friends will agree with them anyway.
I think of Justice Einfeld who was appropriately charged and jailed for lying before a judicial proceeding.
Then I think of me....who has been defamed, degraded, denied civil rights, threatened on a lie their own investigators picked up in 2004 (that was recorded and referred for the next 6 years).
How can Justice Einfeld be jailed for simply saying someone else was driving his car, .... while this other individual can say all sorts of lies and walks around freely for the next 6 years still using the system as a form of stalking and abuse (use of a third party to continue abuse)?
What was the lie? "....she has a medical condition..." after he was charged with domestic violence offences (he stalked, threatened and admitted to).
Why have domestic violence laws if when they are enforced the abuser can say whatever he/she likes to destroy and control the other person
Why have domestic violence laws if others go along for the ride, getting paid e$30,000.00 to e$100,000 dollars per year/per lawyer to keep evidence out of the court - is this a good scam and money making scheme or are the legal eagles mentally deficient/under-skilled -
If my case is 8 years long now that's a lot of money per legal eagle, I sacked my lawyer 4 years ago as they refused to present my evidence/witnesses, being on Centrelink I have had to do what I can to present my evidence (I was prevented from doing so for 6 years, that why the catch-up in October 2010)