M
mr_cj_jr
Guest
...bankruptcy is a bad thing? We all know that GM & Chrysler have been run poorly, thus the reason we are where we're at now.
But, what people fail to realize is that we pretty much had to give them a chance to change their ways instead of immediately going into bankruptcy. Reason, because that no only affects GM & Chrysler, it affects suppliers and everyone upstream as well.
So, just letting them go into bankruptcy without giving them a chance would not have been a good move. Plus, the consumer confidence in buying from a bankrupt company would be even lower than it is now.
I commend this Administration for telling them 'No more money' because GM & Chrysler did not hold up their end of the bargain. Sadly, even though they were given a 'second chance', it looks like bankruptcy might end up the way they're going.
So, can anyone tell me why giving GM & Chrysler a chance to restructure instead of bankruptcy is a bad thing?
But, what people fail to realize is that we pretty much had to give them a chance to change their ways instead of immediately going into bankruptcy. Reason, because that no only affects GM & Chrysler, it affects suppliers and everyone upstream as well.
So, just letting them go into bankruptcy without giving them a chance would not have been a good move. Plus, the consumer confidence in buying from a bankrupt company would be even lower than it is now.
I commend this Administration for telling them 'No more money' because GM & Chrysler did not hold up their end of the bargain. Sadly, even though they were given a 'second chance', it looks like bankruptcy might end up the way they're going.
So, can anyone tell me why giving GM & Chrysler a chance to restructure instead of bankruptcy is a bad thing?