You betcha!
The entire MGW crisis argument rests on 21 IPCC computer climate models that forecast increased CO2 and temperature.
No climate scientist will say they completely understand all of the atmospheric interactions, and they agree that the largest unknown in these interactions is the behavior of water vapor and clouds, so they make educated assumptions about how the atmosphere behaves.
All of the IPCC models assume that cloud formation and dissipation work to increase CO2 (positive "feedback"), enhancing global warming, generating forecasts of dangerous "tipping point" levels of CO2 and runaway temperatures.
But what if those assumptions were wrong? What if water vapor and clouds had a different interaction? One that was less positive, and in fact was negative, helping to moderate atmospheric temperature? Until satellite sensors were launched in the late '90s and early '00s, no one had the observed data to answer that question.
In 2002, NASA launched the Aqua satellite to gather atmospheric temperature data. Award winning climate scientist Dr. Roy Spencer has spent years recording and analyzing the Aqua data, and his recently peer-reviewed and published observations indicate that the IPCC model assumptions are incorrect, to the point that if his observations are verified, the increase in atmospheric temperature is within normal limits.
