Calculating deaths that result from climate change?

[rio]

You actually have something there...but you have to be able to think. I was speculating on how much money and lives have been lost due to the alarmist strategy. I can handle the direct loss but not the indirect. I would bet expenditures for study as well as the carbon footprint, far exceed any relative gain. So that would be a negative factor, every thing has an input output value, or at least a feasible ratio to gain:loss. I also wonder about how much money has been diverted away from other studies, such as aids, poverty, homeless, single mothers, cancer, ...in other words real studies not fictitious. The ideology that climate is a catchall remains stupid beyond recognition, pumping the bucks into something that has no beneficial outcome...just more studies. H..ll the alarmist need to get off their duffs and do something that has value.

 

[Sandman]

I'm looking for a formula to calculate the number of people expected to die as a result of climate change in the future from greenhouse gas emissions in the present day. In particular I'm looking for a 'lives-lost-per-ton-of-carbon-dioxide-emitted' formula, with a view of stating "If we shut down X power station, we will save Y lives".

Any help will be greatly appreciated.
By the way, if you disagree with the concept of climate change, please do not state your views as an answer to my question. I only want my question answering, not querying.