British MP OWNS a news reporter :rofl:

as galloway said thats how this last month of conflict started but it really started several decades ago where israel was the agressor
 
I've seen tons of people being dragged out of rubble on al jazeera that New York Times doesnt report on, its not even about "trying to make things look worse", its bad enough, all Taylor Hicks has to do is find where the bombs killed lots of civilians, and obviosly he's either too lazy or had a deadline to make for a compelling story.

Its not like theres not enough dead civilians in Lebanon for reporters to come up with a story.

Tell me why whenever Israeli soldiers are killed they make a HUGE deal about it. They show the soldiers picture, maybe a backstory about his life, and even a moment of silence going into commercial break. They're soldiers, its part of the job. Meanwhile dead Lebanese civilians are just statistics.
 
What station are you watching. Most of the crying I'm seeing is about the Lebanese civilians, but then I don't watch much TV.

I do like Eureka and 'Dead Like Me', occasionally the discovery channel or the history channel but that's about it.
 
The guy is simply saying what Hezbollah and the Palestinians are saying, except that he's saying it in English and isn't blowing up a bus full of people in the process.
 
Wow, that guy is pretty passionate in his support of Hezbollah.

"Iran is providing missiles to Hezbollah. The US is providing missiles to Israel. Why is it okay for the US to provide missiles, but not okay for Iran to provide missiles?"

He had a bunch more comments similar to those.

My response would be, "Israel uses those missiles to hit specific Hezbollah targets, and Hezbollah aims for the complete destruction of Israel. Hezbollah also kidnapped some of our soldiers. Hezbollah launches their missiles indiscriminately at Israeli cities, and could care less if it blows up a military installation or an elementary school. Do you see the difference?"

I really loved his comments about, "Hezbollah is winning the war!" He made that comment shortly after mentioning that Israel has killed about 30 times more people in the past four weeks than Hezbollah has.

Come on pal, make up your mind.
 
""Iran is providing missiles to Hezbollah. The US is providing missiles to Israel. Why is it okay for the US to provide missiles, but not okay for Iran to provide missiles?""

My take, The US is providing missiles to a sovereign country. If Israel needs to be controlled then it can be done economically by sanctions, blockade etc.

Hezbollah is a paramilitary force that is not bound by the UN, nor can it be controlled by the normal means that a country is controlled by.

Basically Iran and Syria are arming a force over which the only control can be direct confrontation. That is what Israel has been forced to do.


You don't design a weapon with out a safety. You don't give weapons to terrorists.
 
Back
Top