So, since there are some ~3 million XB360 owners, if they all decided to drop another $200 on it in the form of a HD-DVD player, that would basically overide the 800,000 PS3 owners who plan to watch movies on their PS3s.
Realisticly, logically, ideally, how can anyone say that people would rather spend $650 on a PS3 versus another $200 on an HD-DVD player? It does not compute.
At the present time (last time I looked) HD-DVD has ~30 more titles than BR; HD plans to roll out another 250, whiel HD plans to roll out 200 (100 from Sony, alone.)
Largest variety of hardware? 3 to 2 is a 'largest' variety? Oh, they must mean the players that people will come out with, for example, the Pioneer Elites that haven't hit the shelfs, the pre-production manufacturer numbers (~5 more manufacturers to start selling BR versus the ~3 more that will sell HD.)
HD's biggest hurdle, in my opinion, is price: it costs twice as much as HD. The people will always choose the lower price spread if it does the same exact thing. Think for a moment what Sony is doing: if you want the latest Sony movie you will have to buy BR. Movie studios are already talking of making a dual, combo, disc, one that has both BR and HD on it. As far as Disney goes, the same asinine comments can be applied to them as has been said of Nintendo: they make movies for kids. Now, you know the kiddies tend to destroy their little toys, they throw around their DVD disks. Would you be willing to buy them a movie that costs twice as much as a regular DVD movie? Nah, you're gonna buy them the cheaper spread and tell them not to play them on your $1000 player. Face it, you're not about to buy your 10 year old a $650 PS3, you'll give him a $100 GC, instead. Disney is therefore marginalised. Yeah, the movie "Cars" looks great on all those WalMart LCD TVs. But are you going to spend $30 on it when it can be bought for $15 for little Johnny or little Suzie? $10 for the blue light special.