BNP debate - why no mention of the projected 76million population in our lifetimes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Geest Bananas
  • Start date Start date
G

Geest Bananas

Guest
a true threat to the young and middle aged, and barely touched upon in te show Question Time.
 
The BNP are not Racist they seek to protect British people living here more than 6 months.
They seek to shut the UK from Brussels (whom of which are tyrants and depress the UK with illegals.
The Quran is a Violent Book – Don’t believe me Read it! They are against it! (If a Muslim woman is raped and she tells the police, she will be stoned to death!).
They want to leave Iraq and Give control to Iran and make peace with them and let them protect their nation not us. Not our dyeing troops.
They will Protect British People vote for them..

They stand for US..! VOTE BNP
 
Because he didn't get chance to speak hardly. He was cut off on almost every sentence.

He was demonised from the very beginning, even by David Dimbleby, who is supposed to be neutral.
 
It got a brief mention (though not 76m - that's just your figure), but many things didn't get a look in. The Economy, the recession, bankers, the environment, the EU etc etc. It's only 1 hour.
 
It was mentioned. Maybe if there wasn't so much money spent on nuclear weapons, there'd be more for things people really need - housing, healthcare, welfare, public transport, etc.
 
I think it came up briefly, but was sidelined a bit. Something about putting a cap on births. Thing is it's got to end somewhere, hard solution though. Culling, anyone?
 
It was mentioned on my telly. Jack Straw answered at length why a "cap" on the population was a bad idea and would inevitably lead to a China style one child policy. I was surprised none of the mainstream sensible parties mentioned that immigration will be necessary to fund the state pensions of an ageing population.
 
Back
Top