Best and Worst Animated Sequels

It was irresponsible of them to make that film in the first place. Biggest load of preachy, unfunny, dull tripe I've ever seen. Yes, people have rich, cultural heritages and to opress them in anyway is wrong. I kinda knew that. I didn't need my sister and mother to drag me to a beautifully animated polished turd like that. So the sequal could be as bad as could be, and it still would fit up to the quality of that one. Yuckka.

I will add, I'm not a fan of Beauty and the Beast's enchanted Christmas. I actually quite enjoyed the original, but something was just off about it, and it just wasn't as enjoyable. Plus, if he had that holier than thou Pipe organ, where the heck was he in the first film? It reminds me of Invaider Zim having Minimoose with him the whole time.

Plus, it was a perfect waste of Tim Curry.
 
[I will add, I'm not a fan of Beauty and the Beast's enchanted Christmas. I actually quite enjoyed the original, but something was just off about it, and it just wasn't as enjoyable. Plus, if he had that holier than thou Pipe organ, where the heck was he in the first film? It reminds me of Invaider Zim having Minimoose with him the whole time.

Plus, it was a perfect waste of Tim Curry.[/quote]


not to mention where were Zira and the Outlanders in Lion King II, Morganna in TLM II,Ma and Uncle Max in TLK 1 1/2 (o.k that was just a parody but still..)...
 
I would have to agree with you, especially when it comes to Disney. None of the sequels they've produced (Little Mermaid 2, Lion King 1 1/2, etc) added anything new or enlightening to the original films -- they're merely poorly-written hack jobs that go on to ride the originals' coattails for as long as there are pennies to scrap off the floor of the video store...
 
What you mean Pocahontas didn't have a friend named Meccon, who is Raccon and a talking tree named Grandmother Willow. ;) I thought that was basic knowledge in USA History. :evil:
 
I remember hearing about John Rolfe being a tobacco farmer. That definitely wouldn't have passed family/parent standards, especially for a Disney movie. Yeah, either John Rolfe or John Smith apparently saw Pocahontas as something other than a savage heathen. That's really not something they want for a family film, even though both films aren't historical accurate, so they made it happier for the kids.

I actually remember reading a brief page in my history textbook a couple of years ago about Pocahontas and John Rolfe. Darn textbooks for not telling the whole story and reducing it to the size of a paragraph. Anyway, I kind of laugh when people in my class said, "Pocahontas was real?" Thank you, Disney for not labeling that the first film was not the true story and that kids should look it up in the library if they want to know more. At least they fixed that mistake in the sequel.

I did know that Pocahontas died from disease, but I thought that her child died too and that they were in England at the time. I actually read up and found out that there are thousands of people whose ancestors are Pocahontas and John Rolfe. That sound really nice and I'm glad that people could trace their roots like that.

And now to be more on topic:



I'm not sure if I would go that far. I know that Disney sequels have a bad reputation, but I find a vast majority of them to be at least decent enough to watch. The only ones that I find so horrible are Mulan 2 and Pocahontas 2. I also didn't like Brother Bear 2 because of how I felt that it really wasn't needed and that the love focus of the story was much weaker than the original movie. Even though I didn't like that sequel, to me, it was at least more watchable than Mulan 2 or Pocahontas 2. Most other sequels that I've seen aren't as good as the first movie, except for Toy Story 2, but they're decent and watchable.
 
Well, Here's the real story of Pocahontas is anyone cares. I actually somewhat enjoyed Mulan 2, and more than half of the sequels Disney pulled out completey sucked and messed up. And I thought Enchanted Christmas was only that fairly short Golden Book. A waste of money I say if they actually did animate it.
 
Back
Top