ramonesfan05
New member
I remember that. true story.
That's a big problem for me too.Detale, as Snee has pointed out; trading invites defeats the purpose of private trackers. Why would I want to help do that.
Don't worry about Detale. There's a few of them around at the moment acting like they have some sort of superiority complex and being cawks. As soon as you say anything to them about them being twats then they go on about being persecuted and picked on by antisocial lounge members. Fucking eejits. I noticed that thing in his baby thread and thought it was a bit weird that one one hand there's this bloke all happy as he's just had a kid, and on the other having a dig at the rest of us.
Wankers.
Well trading invites has been debated to death both sides have very valid points to them and neither is 100% correct so I will leave that alone.That's a big problem for me too.
Obviously, if I had an invite to something JP wanted, say, and he had something I wanted, that would be an ok trade in my book.
But all the ratios in the world isn't gonna make me want to trade, or for that matter give away something, to unknown invite-section poster #1123 (who might well really be unknown invite section poster #1008, who got banned for cheating). Especially if that potentially meant going against the wishes of the people running the tracker, while at the same time compromising what security the tracker had left.
And I'm not really that keen on suffering through having to read a million +1s and the like, either, obviously.
No offense to you, Detale, like, but that section (invite section that is) would have to change in a big, and, probably, impossible way for it to work in a way that I'd consider using it.
I dunno when I posted last in the BT section proper, but I do have a look now and then.
Could have happened to anyone really. I hope he's not too hard on himself.
@ J dude done you are my girls official "on-Line God Simpson" Thanks