who's got the most these days, i am a member of TL and IPT i just want to know if there is somewhere with more of these rips.
leave some numbers and names for me.
cheers guys
And thereby decreasing the size considerably and maintaining DVD and above quality.
Every re-encoder gives thanks to the original source in their nfo or somewhere in the release notes.I dont care who provides what,As a downloader I am thankful for the encoder and the source and thats that.And if the release groups weren't there, they couldn't do that in the first place. I have much more respect for people who buy/get movies and release them on the internet. Without people with sources there wouldn't be any filesharing and there wouldn't be any scene. They pay money or have good connections and provide all of us with content. The one who puts an untouched Blu-Ray on the net first deserves far more respect than any of those reencoders. He also takes the whole risk. Groups who do reencodes may know how to encode movies, but they don't provide any new content. A good release group is a combination of access to sources and great encoding skills.
Someone who can get retail sources is much more valuable to filesharing than someone who knows how to make an XviD out of an x264.
Reencoders provide an encoding service. Release groups provide content.
Thanks for the lecture but that isint the topic of interest here now,is it?Polarbear said:A good release group is a combination of access to sources and great encoding skills.
depends on your definition of quality. i think you miss the point of BRRips/BDRips Xvid:
- they're standalone friendly
- quality is close to 720p releases and way better than DVDrips or untouched DVDs
- they fit on DVD-R (just like a DVD5)
that said, i see no point in x264 BDRips/BRRips encodes.
Its not about what you download or what you dont.Its for people for whom BR/BD Rips matters.I don't watch movies on a standalone. I don't even own a DVD player.
I prefer quality equal or better to 720p. DVD quality looks really bad on my monitor.
I don't burn any movies on DVD anymore. I have way to many burned CD/DVDs already in my appartment. I store everyhting on HDs nowadays.
So I see no point why I shouldn't go for the best. Especially if it's free. I know those XviD encodes are popular, but not for me. I always download the best quality I can get. SD XviD isn't an option for me.
:lol: Yeah right.Every re-encoder gives thanks to the original source in their nfo or somewhere in the release notes.
IPT has more BDRips/BRRips but many of them are shitty teams encodes.
i'd stick with TL if i were you, and more precisely with ViSiON, SANTi, FLAWL3SS and alternatively D-Z0N3 (for brrip.xvid at least).
you're wrong. there's not much difference between good brrips and bdrips - it really depends on the encoder.
Did he say they are not?Lucifer9999 said:lol... flawl3ss is internal to ipt not tl...
I musnt have said "every" since I dont know every release group out there.But atleast the popular re-encoders does.But you seem to be so fixated on such stuff which to me is pretty silly.:lol: Yeah right.