bazooka sub vs. regular sub?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jfreeballer
  • Start date Start date
J

jfreeballer

Guest
How does a bazooka sub compare with a regular sub of the same size in terms of sound quality/power?
 
bazooka compared to what Kicker?Alpine?Kenwood? you aren't really giving it anything to compare it to. if you are comparing it to some no name sub than they are great subs. but compared to the names listed above it is just average.
 
bazooka is a very good bubble gum but wouldnt taste good on a sub. so i would just eat the regular sub without the bubble gum.
 
Bazooka tubes aren't made to be loud as hell, they're made to be extremely efficient and to fit into small areas. They do produce pretty good sound for their size, but the fidelity, or quality of the sound is fairly averge. As was stated earlier, you need a brand to compare them to. In the whole spectrum of the sub market, they are pretty decent, but they are a very good buy for the money. If you're concerned about space than go ahead and get one, but if you want big boom, or accurate sound, I would go for something else such as a 10" sub in a ported box. 10" would still keep it small but can put out a big punch. It's a nice size to power ratio if you match the sub, box, and amp correctly. This is why Bazooka tubes work so well; the sub is engineered to be extremely efficient with the enclosure.
 
bazooka compared to what Kicker?Alpine?Kenwood? you aren't really giving it anything to compare it to. if you are comparing it to some no name sub than they are great subs. but compared to the names listed above it is just average.
 
Back
Top