A pet peeve of mine in toyetic cartoons in which the toys they are advertising, you are suppose to battle them with each other when you play with them, is how ever conflict seems to be settled the same way.
Is just me, or is in many battle toyetic cartoons, like Pokemon or Bakugan Battle Brawlers that ever single little conflict, no mater how trivial is settled by "having a battle" and the winner gets his or her way?
I know they have to sell the protect and it would be boring if everything is settled by talking it out. But sometimes it gets to the level of silliness, when characters decide where to have lunch or what amusement park ride to go on by "having a battle."
One example in Bakugan is over something not trivial, and I thought to myself just skip the stupid battle, was when Dan wanted to know if this Joe kid was a spy for the villains, instead of just answering the question, they have battle over weather or not, Joe will answer him. Excuse me, but that is important information that should be shared right away. If someone accused me of being a spy and I was innocent, I tell them right away I am not spy.
Is just me, or is in many battle toyetic cartoons, like Pokemon or Bakugan Battle Brawlers that ever single little conflict, no mater how trivial is settled by "having a battle" and the winner gets his or her way?
I know they have to sell the protect and it would be boring if everything is settled by talking it out. But sometimes it gets to the level of silliness, when characters decide where to have lunch or what amusement park ride to go on by "having a battle."
One example in Bakugan is over something not trivial, and I thought to myself just skip the stupid battle, was when Dan wanted to know if this Joe kid was a spy for the villains, instead of just answering the question, they have battle over weather or not, Joe will answer him. Excuse me, but that is important information that should be shared right away. If someone accused me of being a spy and I was innocent, I tell them right away I am not spy.