Atheists, when are you going to stop using such foolishness to try and prove...

K

Kaylyn Shaw

New member
...the flood is fiction? Here are a few example that show you do not even know what happened.
1) You claim that there was no room for the animals, and try to use beetles as example, but there were no beetles on the ark.
2) You claim that the fresh water fish would have died, but the flood could have been fresh water, and got salty after. Fish can adapt from fresh water to salt water.
3) You claim that the geological column show that there was no flood, but you could not have fossilize, unless the dead animal is buried under water fast.
4) You ask how the animals got there from other countries, but this requires that there be other land masses, instead of just one big land mass.
5) You tease that Noah left the unicorn and dinosaurs behind, because you do not see them now. Dinosaurs have been seen recently, and the word unicorn just meant one horn There are rhinoceroses that fit that description.
6) You claim that millions of animals could not fit in the ark, and your right, but there was not million of animals, only a few thousand, and most were smaller then a sheep. They were probably all babies. Babies sleep more, eat less, and could have more kids after the flood.
 
*FACE PALM* How do you know that there were no beetles? That isn't even the point, thousands...not even hundreds of baby animals could not fit on a boat of that size. The one dumb thing the bible did was give an ACTUAL measurement of the size. #3 is completely stupid and you know that as well...at least I hope.

You actually think that Noah was able to gather all the animals in the entire world even if it was one land mass...are you for real? 2 is probably the best you have but then we'd ask...what happened to all the fresh water? Btw, why isn't their a gap in the things we find from everyday life. We see so much signs of life throughout this period. If only a handful of people existed, there would be a hault at some point in history of things like artwork.
 
1) Huh? Beetles? I think it's more important to say that, given the number of species on earth and the size of many of them, beetles are the least of your worries here.
2) No, most fish cannot just "adapt" from fresh to salt water. Some of them, like the bull shark, can swim in fresh water for a period of time, but for the majority, it doesn't work. And you're telling me that, in a world 95% covered by salt water that this wasn't a factor? Please.
3) WTF are you trying to say here?
4) Geological proof that, in the supposed time of the flood, the continents looked like they do today. They've looked that way for a really, really long time.
5) Have you been watching Jurassic Park again? That's not real, sweetie.
6) So now you're going back to your poor argument from your first point? You have no idea how many species of animals there are on earth, do you? Here's a hint: more than "a few thousand" and less than infinity. Clearly more than a boat built by an elderly man could hold.

Here's my makes-a-lick-of-sense flood theory: end of the last ice age, most people lived near water: seas, rivers, lakes, etc.. So now the glaciers are melting, and sea levels are rising, forcing these people to move and changing the landscape. So of course to them it seems like the world had been destroyed, because theirs had. This would explain the fact that mulitple, unconnected societies produced similar myths.

So... now what?
 
How would you know there were no beetles? The bible story says "every kind" of animal, after all....and there are millions of kinds of beetles, lol.

Number 2 is garbage. Fish do not adapt that quickly.

Number 3 is also garbage.

Number 4...oh, my. So, all the continents drifted apart in the past 6,000 years, huh?

5 is garbage, too, and so is #6.

Please tell me you're a poe.
 
The twists and knots in your logic are almost unbelievable.

1) Beetles don't generally swim. So either you're claiming that the beetles that COULD swim evolved quickly into the thousands of species we have now or that the biblical account is incorrect and there were beetles on the ark.
2)Then all the salt water fish would have died. Unless you're trying to tell me all the salt water species EVOLVED to fresh water and then back again for which you have no proof.
3)We have plenty of fossilized evidence of other time periods where certain landmasses were underwater. No reason we shouldn't have any from the flood. Unless ofcourse it never happened.
4)You proved that point yourself. Fail.
5)Cite your source of where you saw a dinosaur. Oh and Unicorn refers to a horse like creature. Otherwise they would have said Rhinoceros.
6) Yeah? There's still billions of animal species on the earth. Where'd they come from then?
 
I don't need to try and prove something is fiction when it contradicts the laws of physics. I'm perfectly fine just assuming that such a thing is impossible.
 
1) then why didn't the beetles drown? The beetles are actually the least of your worries when it comes to space on the Ark, BTW.

2) Rising sea levels would still have had a high salinity when they inundated the land; most of the world's land masses aren't that far above sea level. Freshwater habitats would have turned brackish immediately. While some fish can adapt gradually, only a very few species can survive instananeous changes in salinity. You also fail to explain how saltwater species survived the desalination of the oceans due to the influx of fresh water.

3) Fossilization doesn't always require the animal to die underwater but yes, it is an advantage. However, your claim doesn't explain the depth of strata (which varies from location to location), the different types of strata, or the age of the strata. Or, for that matter, the extinct forms shown in the fossil record.

4) Biblical scholars put the flood at about 2350 BC. Pangea began to break up about 175 million years ago. Laurasia, the last remnant of the supercontinent, began to break up about 150 million years ago. The modern continents were in their current positions by the alleged time of the flood.

5) *facepalm*

6) Please tell me you're a Poe.
 
U mad, bro?

1. The specifications given for the ark in the bible are impossible given his age; despite his metabolism, and especially in the time given.

2. Even if that was true, we would have no salt water fish unless they adapted to fresh water temporarily.

3. Fossils have nothing to do with water.

4. That gives more credibility to the theory of Pangaea.

5. No, they described a horse with a horn.

6. The sheer number of animals would be impossible if as many were wiped out as they would be.
 
U mad, bro?

1. The specifications given for the ark in the bible are impossible given his age; despite his metabolism, and especially in the time given.

2. Even if that was true, we would have no salt water fish unless they adapted to fresh water temporarily.

3. Fossils have nothing to do with water.

4. That gives more credibility to the theory of Pangaea.

5. No, they described a horse with a horn.

6. The sheer number of animals would be impossible if as many were wiped out as they would be.
 
Back
Top