Flying Spaghetti Monster
New member
ARE PEOPLE BORN WITH A SENSE OF MORALITY, OR IS MORALITY SOMETHING YOU ACQUIRE DURING BABYHOOD? THOUGHTS? OPINIONS?
I am trying to figure out if people are born with a sense of morality or if we acquire it during our lives and whether or not it can be influenced by members of authority.
On the one hand, I think that everyone has a sense of morality outside the foundations of religion because most people don't take the Bible (or other Holy documents) as literal truth. Meaning that they don't believe things like killing disobedient children is a suitable punishment, no matter how many times it is repeated in the '' 100% true Holy document ''. Most religious people pick and choose what they want to take as literal truth in the Bible but then there must be a way they do the picking and choosing in the first place!
On the other hand, I have been reading about things such as the Inquasition and the Crusades online and some sources say that in such times, people thought it was perfectly alright to kill others for having different religious views or ''dangerous thoughts inspired by the devil''. Which leads me to ask myself if they honestly thought what they were doing was acceptable. If they did, then obviously there was no sense of morality that allowed them to see what they were doing was unacceptable.
Perhaps it is the fact that the people who commited these atrocities were religious, and thus, they believed that they had a sense of supiriority over the victims they claimed were ' evil '. Perhaps it is in this sense of underserved supiriority that such people become violent, arrogant, and disturbed in the mind. Perhaps I have just answered my own question, but please put in your opinions as well, did I overlook something, are there any other points you would like to add?
Atheists, I know it is long, but thanks to those who read it.
I am trying to figure out if people are born with a sense of morality or if we acquire it during our lives and whether or not it can be influenced by members of authority.
On the one hand, I think that everyone has a sense of morality outside the foundations of religion because most people don't take the Bible (or other Holy documents) as literal truth. Meaning that they don't believe things like killing disobedient children is a suitable punishment, no matter how many times it is repeated in the '' 100% true Holy document ''. Most religious people pick and choose what they want to take as literal truth in the Bible but then there must be a way they do the picking and choosing in the first place!
On the other hand, I have been reading about things such as the Inquasition and the Crusades online and some sources say that in such times, people thought it was perfectly alright to kill others for having different religious views or ''dangerous thoughts inspired by the devil''. Which leads me to ask myself if they honestly thought what they were doing was acceptable. If they did, then obviously there was no sense of morality that allowed them to see what they were doing was unacceptable.
Perhaps it is the fact that the people who commited these atrocities were religious, and thus, they believed that they had a sense of supiriority over the victims they claimed were ' evil '. Perhaps it is in this sense of underserved supiriority that such people become violent, arrogant, and disturbed in the mind. Perhaps I have just answered my own question, but please put in your opinions as well, did I overlook something, are there any other points you would like to add?
Atheists, I know it is long, but thanks to those who read it.