*AnNa>MaRiE*
New member
What does everyone think about this?
I think it is a very poor decision made by a sick individual who clearly does not want to give those affected a chance to mourn, let alone recover.
A factual documentary enlightens us all to the tragic effect the tsunami had in asia, there is no need to cash in on a story about it, let alone one based on a fictional american survivor, and then hide behind the excuse that the money from the film will be donated to charity - as we have all seen, it is not money they need, it is help and order. Another thing they do not need is some ignorant director cashing in on an awful tragedy, not even a year after it occured.
I think it is a very poor decision made by a sick individual who clearly does not want to give those affected a chance to mourn, let alone recover.
A factual documentary enlightens us all to the tragic effect the tsunami had in asia, there is no need to cash in on a story about it, let alone one based on a fictional american survivor, and then hide behind the excuse that the money from the film will be donated to charity - as we have all seen, it is not money they need, it is help and order. Another thing they do not need is some ignorant director cashing in on an awful tragedy, not even a year after it occured.