As we join at the dinner table...

On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:50:25 -0700, "M. JL Esq."
wrote:


Oh look, some person named "Nunya Bidnits" thinks I'm an ass!

My goodness, I'll loose sleep over that.

As par for the course, you're wrong BS Esq, this is the only news
group I belong to, but don't let that stop you from inventing your
bullshit arguments.

When no facts exist, invent them! Right BS Esq? You and sf must get
along wonderfully!
 
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:29:44 -0500, Omelet
wrote:


Thanks for the words of sanity, Omelet. People who wish death on
others are in a class all to themselves. A very low class.

Thinking of Mr. Smiley, the VP as President scares the hell outta me.
 
In article ,
Jim Elbrecht wrote:


I don't see how it disagrees. It says that Obama has no more death
threats than Bush or Clinton did, rather than this specious sense that
he somehow has so much more. The first simply illustrates the examples
against Bush that nobody seemed horrified by when they occurred.

Regards,
Ranee @ Arabian Knits

"She seeks wool and flax, and works with willing hands." Prov 31:13

http://arabianknits.blogspot.com/
 
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 07:38:54 -0700, Ran?e at Arabian Knits
wrote:


I don't know where you're getting this hysteria from - Fox "News"? I
have never been under the impression he was in any more physical
danger than any other president; but it's absolutely certain that the
Tea Partiers and other wingers can't stand having a black president.

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
 
Re:
arabianknits-A47A77.10130120042011@reserved-multicast-range-NOT-delegated.example.com

Ran?e at Arabian Knits wrote:


You just don't get my point. I did see the images. They portray heinous
behavior. I'm not arguing threat level or who had more threats. OK? I'm
saying that any such behavior, in particular the behavior exhibited here by
the OP, advocating that harm come to the POTUS, no matter who it is, is
heinous and degenerate. Does that clear it up? Violence against our leaders
is not the answer.
 
Goomba wrote:

I don't see any real difference between fox news and any of the other
broadcast news shows.

I prefer the local PBS broadcasts of BBC, Al Jazera, Macneil reports &
etc. if for no other reason (though there are a few) than a lack of t.v.
commercials.
--
JL
 
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:03:06 -0400, Landon wrote:


maybe if you threaten to hold your breath until you turn blue obama will
resign.

blake
 
On 21/04/2011 6:19 PM, blake murphy wrote:
My first exposure to Fox was when I was in Colorado in 2002 and I came
across Bill O'Reilly ragging on a retired general about how Bush Sr.
had screwed up in Iraq. He ranted and raved, berated the poor guy, kept
interrupting him and cutting him off. O'Reilly should have known that
the Bush had a mandate to get Saddam out of Kuwait, and that had been
down The general was trying to explain that to him but O'Reilly
wouldn't let him finish.

Okay.... that's not all of Fox, but the network hired the guy and keeps
him on the payroll, along with a few others of his ilk.
 
"blake murphy" ha scritto nel messaggio news

Landon wrote:
And now you'll pay for it, and pay for it, and pay for it, and pay for>> it.


And maybe conservatives will roll back the media and have a look at when the
deficit went wild and who was in office when it happened. And yes, all our
descendents pay and pay and many of them do it in Iraq and Afghanistan.
 
"Ran?e at Arabian Knits" ha scritto nel messaggio

I believe that was meant to be here, on this group. Why are we talking
about anyone else?
 
Back
Top