R
Really Now?
Guest
Is it impossible for you to do one or the other, if so why? Can you the "discuss the issue of God" without having it turn into a "debate of the issue of God"? Why or why not, what does it take? Is it possible for the "debate of the issue of God" to turn into a "discussion of the issue of God"? If so does that means that the debater who is now the one who is willing to discuss, is now converted, or has just given up? Please explain.
"Woah, your thinking way too hard, religion is meant to be funny!"
atheist?
No, not pychic it is all in your statement.
Neil:
Why should I? Are you asking me to tell you what YOU are willing to discuss or debate? That is personal and is based on an individual basis, you are asking me to tell you how to think.
What alternative perspective can an atheist have about the issue of God? To them there is no God, so the context of a discussion about God will not be about God. So what perspective are you talking about ? Either way, both sides are still denying or refusing to accept the other sides perspective. The atheist, refuses to see the perspective of God; and the theists refuses to see the perspective of no God. To say that only theists do this is pointing a hypocritical finger.
"Woah, your thinking way too hard, religion is meant to be funny!"
atheist?
No, not pychic it is all in your statement.
Neil:
Why should I? Are you asking me to tell you what YOU are willing to discuss or debate? That is personal and is based on an individual basis, you are asking me to tell you how to think.
What alternative perspective can an atheist have about the issue of God? To them there is no God, so the context of a discussion about God will not be about God. So what perspective are you talking about ? Either way, both sides are still denying or refusing to accept the other sides perspective. The atheist, refuses to see the perspective of God; and the theists refuses to see the perspective of no God. To say that only theists do this is pointing a hypocritical finger.