Are pro-lifers ever going to offer a logical alternative to abortion or r they

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rotten LimeNinja
  • Start date Start date
R

Rotten LimeNinja

Guest
just going to whine incessantly? until the end of time?

The Pro-lifers answers to abortion...

1) Adoption - Yeah, sure, as long as the child is a white female baby under the age of three. Those are the babies that people stand on line for. Then the white male babies under the age of three. Just make sure you aren't an HIV positive, black male teen.

2) Abstinence - Not a solution to the problem, more like scolding someone for leaving the barn door open.

3) Hmmm... guess that's about it.

Yeah, 3rd trimester abortions are dicey. Yeah, people should wear condoms. Yeah, people should wait until marriage. Yeah, people should fight off rapists. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Woulda, shoulda, coulda.

HOW DO YOU SOLVE THE PROBLEM PRO-LIFERS???

Until you have a real, practical, logical, sensible, acceptable solution to overpopulation, unwanted babies, and human stupidity, forcing every pregnancy to come to term is tantamount to creating life for the sole purpose of experiencing misery. Use your freaking melons for Pete's sake. Abortion is necessary.

Unless, of course you're all willing to take in EACH AND EVERY ONE of these babies in, feed them, clothe them, shelter them, educate them, and LOVE THEM, in the same fashion as you'd love your own children.

You aren't?

OH, then take a big spoonful of S-T-F-U!

(And that goes for your god, too.)
 
I disagree with the premise that all babies born into misery will stay there. who are you to decide how people will live out the course of their lives.

the 12 yr old girl with no job or house, that has a baby might, oh I dunno, get a job and a house once she sees her newborn for the first time.

Talk to women who have had abortions, or former abortion industry employees. See what the women think about on what would have been their child's birthday.

See how the 12 yr old who got raped is now successful and stable, and now wishes they could do it over.
 
Oh so because people can't take responsibility for their own actions, and because a baby might be inconvenient to you and/or society we should just kill babies. Yeah that makes real sense doesn't it. So what if a toddler around 3 or 4 becomes inconvenient to a mother because she wants her career back?? Are you going to allow her to choose to kill then?? And abortion in cases where the baby will have a disease like cerebal paulsy or spina bifida, they're killed because they won't have a good life.....are you going to kill all those kids and adults with those types of conditions because if a baby is better off dead than living with a condition then following that logic so is anyone with that condition....I don't see you calling out for their blood too...aren't they just as inconvenient as kids in the social welfare system?? don't they take just as much if not more money to keep alive than a foster kid or a kid in an orphanage?? Come on...be consistent, following your logic you must want all of them dead too because they're inconvenient to society.

At least be consistent, but please get some sense and see you're wrong
 
the only instance i can see abortion as a viable option is if someone is raped. because honestly i wouldn't hesitate in killing a rapist, and if i couldn't, then i probably would kill their offspring. there are enough people out there though who can't bear children, so adoption is the remedy for most abortion.
 
*Starts a slow-clap, hoping it will catch on*

Jess D- Your idea is nice, but do you know how hard it is for a 12 year old to get a job, let alone.. a house? Yes.. she might get one in the future, but that doesn't feed the baby now.. does it?
 
your question has more to do with the alternatives after a baby is born.

the logical alternative to not killing a baby is to let it live. pretty simple, actually.
 
Back
Top