...and is a self-described Marxist? Seriously, Delaware wants to have someone in Congress representing them who is Harry Reid's quote "pet" ?? (lapdog) VS. a woman who has maybe a few odd things in her past, but has since explained them satisfactorily? If you have watched her interviews, she has been asked about her financial controversies, and about other problems from her past, and she has given a more than adequate explanation for it.
Other than that, she is a woman who is campaigning as a traditional conservative who wants to work to control Washington's unsustainable spending, and to promote smaller, less intrusive government. So why are liberals continuing to try to defame her based on her past controversies when she has given an explanation for them already? Why aren't they instead attacking her on the substance of her campaign messages? Would Delaware voters honestly prefer to elect Coons who is Harry Reid's Marxist "pet"?
Smartass - You would rather vote for a lapdog i.e. "pet" rather than vote for a candidate who will answer the the PEOPLE of the state of DE?
Other than that, she is a woman who is campaigning as a traditional conservative who wants to work to control Washington's unsustainable spending, and to promote smaller, less intrusive government. So why are liberals continuing to try to defame her based on her past controversies when she has given an explanation for them already? Why aren't they instead attacking her on the substance of her campaign messages? Would Delaware voters honestly prefer to elect Coons who is Harry Reid's Marxist "pet"?
Smartass - You would rather vote for a lapdog i.e. "pet" rather than vote for a candidate who will answer the the PEOPLE of the state of DE?