Having been educated and working in scientific fields for, oh, almost 30 years now, I don't understand why anybody would put any meaningful weight behind the concept of "scientific concensus". It's not science, it's simply a vote of belief.
Science is science and consensus is opinion.
For the AGW/CC scaremongering "consensus" to be science, it would have to show all the data, all the methodology, all the modeling assumptions, and how the conclusions were reached, and then for it to be accepted science, it would have to be able to withstand scientific debate and scrutiny and be reapeatable. It's none of these things. And when researchers delete the raw data and collude to prevent opposition voices from being heard, that raises a huge red flag regarding the reliability and accuracy of the science.
Now, I'm not denying that evolution exists, nor do I believe it should not be taught in school. Most conservatives do no deny it either. You'd have to be really stupid to believe we do. Oh.