Apple iPhone 4 (Retina Display) vs SAMSUNG Captivate (Super AMOLED)

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.1-update1; en-gb; SAMSUNG-SGH-I897/I897UCJF6 Build/ECLAIR) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17)

I'm still hit or miss with both phones. I'll swap my sim in either or on a daily basis.
 
the picture is better on the galaxy... where do you see that the iphone 4 is better?

(this is basing it solely on the pictures posted.)
 
He said no one wants large phones. He didn't say anything about large screens...........just saying. You can fit a 4"+ screen in the iPhone frame.
 
I have the best of both worlds. My iPhone has intrusive notifications and the pulldown notifications ala Android thanks to jailbreak.
 
SuperAMOLED over The IPS panel on the iPhone 4. The first thing I noticed was the backlight, really hated it.
Oversaturation, no it's not oversaturated, LCD's are just washed out. next
Text is obviously sharper on the iPhone
Size? 4.0" Perfect, 3.5" is small now.
 
Since I have had both phones, I prefer the iPhone 4 for reading text, but the picture quality (of all the wallpapers in my links in siggy) look a lot better on the Captivate.
 
Lets just face it, the iPhone desperately needs a JB to do a host of simple things like sim management, drop down menu notifications, Google Voice(app not webapp), free navi, network information, Android does not. Both of them have their pros and cons and a good bit of it is personal preference (which a good amount of Android users seem to enjoy) ala Widgets.
 
Nobody wants thick phones, e.g. like bricks. But you can get away up to a certain extent with thin phones. In the pocket, a thick slider phone with a smaller screen will bulge out more than a touch screen only phone with a large screen but with a very thin profile.

Just for anecdotal record, I talked to a lot of middle aged and older people, and for them a large screen phone with a display that they don't have to squint at is most desirable. Considering the growing aging population worldwide, this is of demographic importance. This is more than just a "fashion trend", larger screen phones are here to stay and is going to be more common in the future.

Another demographic factor is the increasing obesity with people, especially among the middle and older aged. This means thick fingers, and you need bigger screens and so on. I am not suggesting that we go extremes like the Japanese Sumo wrestlers being issued iPads for phone calling (true story!) but you get the basic idea.
 
Actual pixels don't really matter for picture rendering. The sub-pixel combination used by Samsung is to more closes reflect how the retina works, what colors we are more sensitive to.

The absolute resolution matters much more for text display, hence text being sharper on the iP4.
 
Actually with the two side by side, the iPhone 4 displays high resolution images much better too. The pentile based Super AMOLED is just not up to displaying rich text and high resolution images without pixelation. (sp).
The IPS LCD display does a much better job in my opinion. It's not THAT much smaller. I'd gladly give up size for a much higher resolution and truer image.
 
To each his/her own. I find the iPhone to be easier to use in most everyday situations.
I am hoping one day that all the inconsistencies in Android can be addressed.

A jailbreak really isn't that big of a deal. Takes a few seconds and most of those apps were submitted to the App Store and rejected - that's why they end up on Cydia or other repositories.

While I agree that for some reason Jobs has some kind of problem with people modifying their phones, it does lead to more stable, more fluid and more consistent applications.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_0_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8A306 Safari/6531.22.7)



I'm not sure I can agree with that. The screen size is very notable to me. Even the nexus ones' 0.2" bigger screen I can tell right away when I get back to an iPhone. Admittedly though, the iPhones screen is MUCH sharper. I've had these two phones for a few weeks now (two different captivates) and I still cannot decide what's a better choice for me. Now if we can put froyo on an iPhone 4, I could live happily
 
Most of those apps never bothered to be submitted
I can't recall the last time I got a force close, there are tons of quality apps for Android and there are tons of junk apps just like there is for the iPhone. I don't notice a difference between the Geico Glovebox app that was recently released for Android, same "quality". Urban dictionary app works great, looks great. The TweetDeck beta is looking really good, fluid, attractive, stable.. Beejive is bringing their IM client over to Android. CoPilot works extremely well. Springpad is awesome. The News&Weather/Genie Widget works great.. the speedtest.net app actually gives correct ping readings with Android.

Rooting is far from necessary on Android (maybe unless you have an AT&T molested Android device and need to sideload something), and it's becoming easier with time. There is a huge list of things the iPhone can't do without JB'ing, there is no denying that.

It won't be soon before millions of iPhone 3G and iPod Touch devices are obsolete like the iPhone 2G. Fragmentation for iOS anyone?
 
Back
Top