Thats the thing, if a "artistic" director attaches his name, all sorts of drivel will be rationalized, anything will bring out the apologists. I dont care if he lost his mind, what he put out was pure drivel. Its like saying a cr@p film is worthy because its evidence the director is an idiot. That alone has no value. Its just a statement of fact. He was mental, so other than the fact that he got some shmucks to fund him, i don't see anything worth praising there at all. Theres no insight, just stuff flung at the wall.
And yes, it might be true, if he's self aware enough to know he's feeding people cr@p it might be a big joke.