Another Winner from Food network (OT)

On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:31:04 -0700, Dan Abel wrote:


Why didn't you look yourself, wiseass? There is plenty of reliable
evidence demonstrating that children who harm animals become
desensitized and are very likely to become highly abusive as adults,
many go on to become serial killers. A four year old is far too young
to comprehend that killing a fish is different from killing a sibling.
Children shouldn't be taken fishing until at least 6-7... and even
then shouldn't be permitted to disgorge a hook,or even watch until
8-9. No one who lives within 100 miles of a suppermarket needs to
hunt wild animals except those with small egos and even smaller
peepees... there is no comparison between wild animals and livestock.
There is absolutely no sport in hunting, it's pure murder of a
defenceless living creature.

http://www.spca-kwt.co.za/Downloads/Inspectorate/Animal_Cruelty_Human_Violence_Link_Holly_Nash.pdf
 
On 2011-03-29, Christine Dabney wrote:

IOW, the smarmy witch is more worried about her image than any
inconvenience of having to dice onions with a dying drape-ape. If I
was the kid, I'd tell her to bugger off, cuz I've changed my mind and
now wanna visit an opium den with Charlie Sheen. ;)

nb
 
On 30/03/2011 9:27 PM, Steve Pope wrote:

PETA. Now there is a credible source. Not that they refer to abuse of
animals not hunting for food.



Not all childreneare so far removed from the reality of their food
source that they do not think of hunting.
 
On 2011-03-29, Ran?e at Arabian Knits wrote:


Maybe Ima Garpin felt kinda like that old saw, "Who'd wanna be in an
organization that would have me as a member."

nb
 
Dave Smith wrote:




I advocate banning several of the things you mention, and strictly
regulating the remaining.

I do not accept "gee if you're going to ban X why not ban Y" arguments.
That is not careful analysis of the issues.


Steve
 
On 29 Mar 2011 13:41:40 GMT, notbob wrote:


Seems you enjoy being called an asshole Bob, calling a 6 year old boy dying
from Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia a dying drape ape is low even for you.
 
Re: [email protected]

Dave Smith wrote:


I never said or implied that they have any such right.


That probably was bad form on their part. But it's likely her PR people made
the decision and my point remains that turning down Make A Wish with all
it's attendant good publicity isn't good form for a publicist either.

MartyB
 
Dave Smith wrote:

It's like wanting to meet with a sports star. Plenty of sports stars
are happy to meet fans for the Make a Wish foundation. Some aren't. So
they should take requests like "I want to meet a basketball star" or "I
want to meet a celebrity chef" but not requests for a specific person.
I'd be thrilled at a visit by any celebrity chef.
 
On 28/03/2011 11:38 PM, Ran?e at Arabian Knits wrote:


It looks like it may have been the mother's blogging that did it. She
wrote that Ina (or her rep) had replied that she had a 10 month book
tour lined up. She also says that he was wanted to meet here for three
years. This kid has wanted to meet Ina Garten since he was three years
old??? I am getting the impression that TMZ picked up on it from her
blog, and I have to wonder how TMZ would ever have come across is had
the mother not brought it to their attention.

http://www.angelsforenzo.com/march2011update2.htm
 
Dave Smith wrote:


I trust them, pretty much, and I don't think there are any factual errors
in the link I posted.

To be truthful, I thought I'd post a PETA link, but there are plenty
of other sources for the same information.

Steve
 
On 30/03/2011 9:58 PM, Steve Pope wrote:


Find one that points out the difference between killing an animal for
food and torturing animals.
 
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:13:56 -0700, Ranee at Arabian Knits
wrote:


First and foremost, it's a dangerous sport - many people (and domestic
animals) are killed every year by hunters and my family didn't want
them shooting their guns every which way on our property. Secondly,
we don't need to hunt animals for food in this day and age - it's an
unnecessary "sport". When it's a matter of survival, hunting is not a
sport anymore - but when a grocery store is a few minutes away from
home - hunt for your meat there.

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
 
In article ,
sf wrote:


I understand the first objection, we don't object to hunting, but we
don't want people hunting on our land. However, how often do you find
game at the grocery store? For even a comparable price as dry lot beef
or battery chicken?

Regards,
Ranee @ Arabian Knits

"She seeks wool and flax, and works with willing hands." Prov 31:13

http://arabianknits.blogspot.com/
 
On 31/03/2011 3:55 PM, Mark Thorson wrote:

If you have enough property that people would want to hunt on it, a few
ounces of led isn't going to do much. If friends and relatives wanted to
fish in your pond they would probably cause more lead pollution.
 
Back
Top