magpie_complex
New member
Not sure maths is quite your strong point. 
Saying that Goldblum is on better form than usual is saying nothing. He is clearly struggling on screen here, which in places is quite embarrassing. You know that his last decent leading man role was in 1986 (The Fly) right?!
And have you seen Bateman when he's on form? Any episode of Arrested Development. he's got great potential as a leading man, but he doesn't do himself any favours here.
Agree with you in part about Robinson, but wouldn't go as far as saying astonishing though. Still, he gives the best performance out of any other cast member, which quite the indictment.
But if that's your 75% of what's good about the film, then in a sense you're right, as it's easy to ignore.

Saying that Goldblum is on better form than usual is saying nothing. He is clearly struggling on screen here, which in places is quite embarrassing. You know that his last decent leading man role was in 1986 (The Fly) right?!
And have you seen Bateman when he's on form? Any episode of Arrested Development. he's got great potential as a leading man, but he doesn't do himself any favours here.
Agree with you in part about Robinson, but wouldn't go as far as saying astonishing though. Still, he gives the best performance out of any other cast member, which quite the indictment.
But if that's your 75% of what's good about the film, then in a sense you're right, as it's easy to ignore.
