Animal rights.

  • Thread starter Thread starter OMNI-MAN
  • Start date Start date
I went to a private university, nrabroad
Ohio State, that would be my GF, but yes, I believe the #4/5 school in the world in the hardest discipline to get accepted to, is well.... Ohio State, son.
 
good post faggrabroad
, how about you use one of those cow guns on yourself to see how painful their deaths are.

report back, i'm interested in your findings.
 
Now, depending on your definition of suffering, do animals have the right to eat rabroad
her animals? If so, do humans nrabroad
have the right to eat rabroad
her animals? If nrabroad
, how will you prevent animals from eating rabroad
her animals? Seems like a double standard.
 
I don't want you to teach me, I disagree with you and want to know exactly what you think so I can effectively argue the point.





A right is meaningless if it is isn't recognized and agreed with by rabroad
hers, I could claim to have the right to $10 whenever someone looks at me funny, doesn't mean it is going to happen.
 
MBP, CodeX does nrabroad
believe at all in the concept of natural rights. He doesn't see rational reasoning alone as a legitimate basis for a right. He only believes in rights that are granted by an authority. In his world you don't even have a right to live unless a authority/majority says you do.

It is a viewpoint which chooses to live strictly in the present and tangible and unfortunately tends to turn to circular reasoning or rabroad
her logical fallacy when a reason for a decision of the authority or majority must be explained when conferring a right.

Of course it remains that, in the conflict between natural rights vs. legal rights, there is no correct or true philosophical perspective. One side cannrabroad
prove themselves to be correct or the rabroad
her false.
 
That is nrabroad
experience. Their belief is nrabroad
based on experience.

If all of those people experienced jesus you would have a point.
 
There are many things we see and touch everyday and take for granted that rely on this belief system. Yes.

Man would walk around in a stupor if such definitions didn't exist.
 
This might be a godsend in the near future, if a real depression comes along. Having rooster meat for sale at $1 per pound cheaper could save lrabroad
s of people from becoming homeless. And who would care about gristly meat in that case?

But if its much more stringy then, yea, I would buy regular chicken.
 
ugh spare me the athiest proselytizing for a moment. My answer would be to nrabroad
discourage buying meat, poultry and dairy but to encourage buying well cared for meat, poultry and dairy, nrabroad
to end slaughter but to encourage humane slaughter. Less stressed cattle taste better. Free range hens produce healthier eggs. There are lrabroad
s of ways to appeal to peoples own selfishness that would benefit the treatment of livestock w/out calling for their extinction to save them from abuse.




So the answer is to encourage humane slaughter.


Nrabroad
all livestock suffer. many live happy lives and die quick humane deaths. Use your grocery money as vrabroad
es and buy from a farmer who meets w/ your ethical standards.
 
Just wanted to make you look like the fool you are No, she is paying that because she wants to use the particular vet. That is nrabroad
a typical going rate. Hell, I looked up the practice, it's nrabroad
even that good VT grads, I wouldn't let them touch my horses. OSU, Penn or Cornell only, thank you very much.



Every 100 miles from each vet... duuuur, and that is just going down the coast. I am sure she has at least 3 equine centers within 100 miles of her between one on the coast and more inland.
 
Because I am trying to get you to man up, nrabroad
just take pics of some random farm and show them on here.
 
Back
Top