Android 3.0 being mentioned still almost seems to quick. While the technological advances of Google Maps is obvious the platform will likely take on the same flaws we see in platforms that move too quickly without true new technological advancement in development tools that exemplify a new platform. Android developers as well as all developers must become aware of this issue by now. The advancements are towards the Iphone in some instances without elaboration and will become generic(nerd-like) and technologically intricate without benefit.
With the significant advancements from 1.0 to 2.3 we have seen intricate and abundant new quality to the platform. Though most would agree that 3.0 should introduce an entirely new platform. At this point while it is still early we are kind of seeing a step backwards. This has been a plague across the development community since about 2004. The introduction of generic mass software without support. Instead of a new platform we see an opening of the original platform and the need for higher end support. While development of the platform will be furthered in certain areas that have already succeeded other applications will become lost and more unusable. It is my recommendation that the Android operating system move slowly and specifically 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7 and on to 3.0 while developing applications such as Google maps, learning , entertainment, gaming, etc at their higher levels and introducing new platforms to guide applications correctly.
A move directly towards 3.0 will halt needed development as I have stated. Androids competitive advantages will eventually be lost as the abundance of generic moves and segmentation toward Itune/Iphone-like software becomes apparent. This is undoubtedly a difficult stage for software development, though the simple and easiest way to move forward would be to continue the failing pattern which leads to years of basic development on 4.0 and 5.0 placing you at no better than a Microsoft situation. Continue to progress the output of developer tools but realize that whole numbers exemplify new platforms that are yet to exist and not necessarily the amount of information produced specifically when most of which has been developed on other platforms in a more advanced form. Android needs to be seen as independent and not simply a release to compete with Apple alone. 3.0 for Android needs to be nearly a life a changer and if you get to 3.0 without fully doing this, it should allow for development understanding that 4.0 will be. It nearly needs to project interactive images while interacting with one another lives.
I believe Mobile devices, as many do, are infrastructure tools of the future, creating continuous lifestyles within their own and the modernized culture and sophistication in today's world. Though we do not want to simpilify too soon as we don'tt want a Judge Dread Oscar Mayer lifestyle for the mass on our hands. It has to stay intricate, it has to stay attractive, and it needs to create a better world for all citizens amongst the work place and the outside world.
No one advancement can dictate the move forward, and can only help by allowing ones information to become available to guide a structured outcome. It is important they move with controlled haste while understanding the new possibilities. It will be the peoples concern to never limit the opportunities as these opportunities advance the entire platform from the medium to new sophistication. At times we see those whom move forward amongst the new level of progress halted by those who simply choose not to pursue. If my word is law, then a true explanation from those who do so is needed at this time. I have spent my time on countless forums and with writings, I am sure the explanation will be quite elaborate. Though no Shanigans/BullS*** and if this doesn't pertain to you please only comment on the prior paragraphs. It is obvious that most times there is structure against opposing new structure from a platform made available to produce such action.
With the significant advancements from 1.0 to 2.3 we have seen intricate and abundant new quality to the platform. Though most would agree that 3.0 should introduce an entirely new platform. At this point while it is still early we are kind of seeing a step backwards. This has been a plague across the development community since about 2004. The introduction of generic mass software without support. Instead of a new platform we see an opening of the original platform and the need for higher end support. While development of the platform will be furthered in certain areas that have already succeeded other applications will become lost and more unusable. It is my recommendation that the Android operating system move slowly and specifically 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7 and on to 3.0 while developing applications such as Google maps, learning , entertainment, gaming, etc at their higher levels and introducing new platforms to guide applications correctly.
A move directly towards 3.0 will halt needed development as I have stated. Androids competitive advantages will eventually be lost as the abundance of generic moves and segmentation toward Itune/Iphone-like software becomes apparent. This is undoubtedly a difficult stage for software development, though the simple and easiest way to move forward would be to continue the failing pattern which leads to years of basic development on 4.0 and 5.0 placing you at no better than a Microsoft situation. Continue to progress the output of developer tools but realize that whole numbers exemplify new platforms that are yet to exist and not necessarily the amount of information produced specifically when most of which has been developed on other platforms in a more advanced form. Android needs to be seen as independent and not simply a release to compete with Apple alone. 3.0 for Android needs to be nearly a life a changer and if you get to 3.0 without fully doing this, it should allow for development understanding that 4.0 will be. It nearly needs to project interactive images while interacting with one another lives.
I believe Mobile devices, as many do, are infrastructure tools of the future, creating continuous lifestyles within their own and the modernized culture and sophistication in today's world. Though we do not want to simpilify too soon as we don'tt want a Judge Dread Oscar Mayer lifestyle for the mass on our hands. It has to stay intricate, it has to stay attractive, and it needs to create a better world for all citizens amongst the work place and the outside world.
No one advancement can dictate the move forward, and can only help by allowing ones information to become available to guide a structured outcome. It is important they move with controlled haste while understanding the new possibilities. It will be the peoples concern to never limit the opportunities as these opportunities advance the entire platform from the medium to new sophistication. At times we see those whom move forward amongst the new level of progress halted by those who simply choose not to pursue. If my word is law, then a true explanation from those who do so is needed at this time. I have spent my time on countless forums and with writings, I am sure the explanation will be quite elaborate. Though no Shanigans/BullS*** and if this doesn't pertain to you please only comment on the prior paragraphs. It is obvious that most times there is structure against opposing new structure from a platform made available to produce such action.