I read the first couple of paragraphs. If the remaining paragraphs are like the first few then you didn't miss much.
Here is the thing about Obama. People forget this, but it is a truth.
We elected a patsy.
The Dems had a plan and there plan went haywire in the weirdest fucking way.
I don't know who Saul Alinsky is (but I will Google him shortly), but check out this quote from the article:
First.... why is it that we are always suggesting the current president wants a dictatorship? They said it about GWB, they said it about Clinton...
doesn't matter who is in office. Some tripe is gonna come out of the woodwork and swear the guy has some plan to enact the war powers act or some shit to have a dictatorship.
But here is the thing about Obama. He was a patsy that got elected. He isn't screwing up the economy cause he has a master plan. He is screwing up the economy because he is high on his own ideals and is too stupid to not screw up the economy.
The article is talking like it takes a mad genius to screw up the economy. It doesn't. Elect me and see what happens. I may be mad, but I am no genius!
Hillary was supposed to win the primary. Obama was this political hack from Chicago that wasn't supposed to stand a chance against her.
That he won the primary wasn't supposed to happen. When he was brought in to run against Hillary - the only person that believed he would be president was Obama. No one else was fooled.
I point this out because the first couple of paragraphs that I did read are suggesting incredible things, things that are.... insane.