Some literary experts disqualify some spiritual gurus as 'writers' for they improvise. Such extempore discourses later published in book form and go on to become bestsellers. What is the logic behind such discrimination ?
By their logic if someone gets his manuscript typed by a typist, instead of typing or writing himself, he is not recognized as a genuine writer.
Is that so?
By their logic if someone gets his manuscript typed by a typist, instead of typing or writing himself, he is not recognized as a genuine writer.
Is that so?