@crusher
I can only say that :
Impossible to get Security information!
comes out after calling : BFC_GetSecurityInfo
which must be a double check somehow,
because before that it calls : BFC_SecurityMode
and checks for any error in that or not the proper Security mode (Factory mode expected). These previous checks must be passed correctly, since no relevant error message appears !...
Maybe the answer is in Papuas comments for original 079d vers., that it is not fully tested for SL75 !...
@_caine
Although not quite found the reason for deference between 079g and 079e (both English) I can certainly say that the difference between 079e (english) and 079d (original) is expected (difference in handling 5123 block).
You see the English 079e, 079g etc is based on sources of orignal 079c and NOT the 079d...
The comments of Papuas, announcing 079d, say that it is fixed a problem with 5123 block for S75 ! (meaning that this problem may existed already in 079c original).
Since your example for C75 was an AMD one, we can't compare it with the original 079d , which does not support AMD flashes in "Flash" page, BUT what about running it with 079e ?
P.S.
I am NOT such an expert, in technical matters, as Papuas is !!!
May be, we need his help to merge all those versions and resolve this problem....
But until then, I think 079e is working better !