A Prize for the best Avatar

Now I know who is giving Archangel his excuse for this silly thread. I had gotten to associating Marc with the truck, instead.

I do have a favorite avatar here, that I've seen around. But that poster hasn't been about lately, so perhaps it wouldn't be polite to discuss outside their presence, even though it's a compliment.
 
And here we have another who reaRAB yet doesn't comprehend. And you even quoted the post. Now show where I said my mood state was affected at all by this cover? Read it again penfold, and slowly this time. We should offer a prize for the most truthful and affective Avatar a member produces. And right now, I think marcs is the most accurate in describing a current political reality which exemplifies why when a politician promises us "change" in the future, we will ask what those changes are.

As you can see it refers to content and the quality of the message regarding the farce of our current political reality with your preferred loon of a messiah.
 
Are you pretending to not see the motive behind this thread? The point wasn't awarding anybody for an interesting avatar. The only purpose for this thread was for achie to attack obama in an underhand way. It was actually clever. I actually thought the avatar was funny, even though I support obama. Mad magazine deserves the credit though, not marc.
 
The best thing about this thread is that Archie has no understanding of what "right" and "left" actually are.

Notice he doesn't associate an administration that racked up huge amounts of debt, exponentially expanded government's size and interference, expanded socialist medicine and had numerous foreign interventions as "liberal."
 
Of course Mad gets the credit for its ability to accurately portray Obama with humor. But marc gets the credit for choosing that as his avatar and his insight for recognizing its creative value as one. And what do you mean this is just an opportunity to attack Obama? My intentions are much larger than that. I am attacking liberalism and the loony lefty ideology on every level of its insanity. Here's another great image in the form of a cartoon which would make a great Avatar or siggy and which most leftists around here would identify with perfectly.

diversitylanefamilytree.jpg
 
I didn't take it like that and maybe I was wrong on the 'intent' but still to get so personally insulting is still IMHO wrong and to the detriment of our discourse. It just seems to me that people are spending more time cussing each other out lately than having any real discussion....
 
Satire directed at the president what an original idea to convey second hand.

So you want to give marc an award for lifting an idea but not the JPEG?

The reason you do not respond to my posts is because you are afraid, you know you would loose.

Why not setup a pole asking the question who is the bigger troll, Arch or Accipiter.

You won’t do it because you know you would lose.
 
See, I gotta call BS when I see it. Pen and Accip, Arch started a thread in a polite way on an interesting topic that's largely apolitical (negating the content of the avatar) and you jumped in and started with the personal stuff in a very rude way. What gives? Are we so partisan that we can't laugh together or even communicate without bashing? Are we going to turn this into AWE?
 
Isn't that his entire reason why he's here? If you differ from his exceedingly narrow views on anything, he calls you horrible names without addressing your actual argument.
 
Do a little experiment for yourself CxT, go back and look at all of the threaRAB I have started here and see how incredibly quickly; and I mean instantly, from the very first response, how even the most innocent thread topics were attacked in off topic manners such as occurred here. 4Forums.com Political Debates and Polls - Search Results If you follow the vast majority of the responses to my posted opinions, you will see off topic attacks which have very little to do with the actual points I was making. Check it out, you will be amazed at the ignorance I have dealt with because I refuse to compromise my values for the acceptance of the hate mongers here.
 
The usage of "affective" is erroneous, "effective" would be correct. "Affective" relates to emotion, as I alluded in my response, whereas "effective" fits within the context of the intent of he sentence, describing how well something might work (or not). The OP is a troll against your democratically elected President.
 
Back
Top