!*L!k3*M3N
New member
Shouldn't that be s semi-colon?
Perhaps policies regarding the posting of reviews are out of our control, but I believe things like that are what help fuel view counts. And if that's the case, there's not much we can do about it unfortunately.
My reaction to this has always been: what makes some sites so special? I mean, why do some sites need to be referred to with asterisks and some sites can be talked about openly. Also, the same goes for screen shots and reviews.
Please no one say tracker rules, every site I belong to has a clause somewhere in their rules to not openly discuss the site.. but people only respect the wishes of some of those sites.. I don't care how "rare" your tracker is or if you think that your tracker is the shit or you think you are special, all sites are the same and should be treated as such.
Like I said personal ethos.If someone politely requests that I don't specifically do something and it doesn't hurt anyone not to do it then personally I would think myself a total jerk if I didn't comply .
Maybe I'm not looking at the bigger picture, maybe I'm a naive idiot but that's how I chose to live my life or rather the minuscule the part of my life that I have any control over.
EPICIdoleyes787 said:It was a joke I thought that was obvious.
If I was really upset I wouldn't use the words donkey wiener I'd use something like ratiocinating or caviling as in " Ewwwyourface there is no point in trying to ratiocinate with you or cavil about your stupidity so I will instead put it succinctly . Idiot .
So end of the day i couldnt see management accepting this, making this discussion pretty much redundant.