9 Most Racist Disney Characters

I will have to agree with most of it.The only thing I disagree on is King Louie. Honestly I never thought of him of being anything but an oranguatan.
EDIT: Should this be moved to the Disney section?
 
I'm aware of most of those, and I confess they are somewhat stereotypical. The only offender I find pretty out of place is the blackfish in Little Mermaid...I don't know what the hell they were thinking when they put that in. I know people will try to chime and say we're being too P.C. about it, but those are the ones that usually don't have to deal with stereotypes in the first place.
 
Um... what about the Siamese Cats from Lady and the Tramp :confused:

Alot of animations tends to trade fairly heavily in stereotypes; so inevitable some of those stereotypes will be racial.
 
While much of this is accurate, 2-3 seem to be a product of the writer's sour attitude instead of objective reality. Sebastian racist? Really? Am I to understand fish actually have something to give a damn about under the sea?

In regard to Aladdin: Heck, pick up a newspaper sometime. Or a history book. Much of the Middle East isn't tolerant today, how do folks think it was many centuries back? And the picture he used for Aladdin is horribly misleading due to the lighting, anyone can see that under normal circumstances he's basically colored like the rest for the entire movie. Any youtube video is proof enough. To be blunt its BS, and he loses a lot of legitmacy for trying such a cheap tactic.

Peter Pan Indians: I can see the skin color thing, but the rest? Lighten up.
 
I think the Siamese cat from Aristocrats is more politically incorrect than the ones in Lady & the Tramp or Chip & Dale. I'm surprised he wasn't mentioned.


I agree with whoever said King Louie shouldn't be on that list. He and the monkeys didn't act like the Black stereotype at all (which is easy to see if you compare them to the Dumbo crows).
 
I agree with most of this list, but I have a problem with a couple of things. First off, most of these characters are sterotypes and somethings they do become racist. However, some of the characters like Sebastian and King Louie never seemed rasict to me. I see them as being stereotypes, but I wouldn't go farther than that.



I completely agree. I am glad that Disney did change that opening line because I could see and understand how offense that was to people from the Middle East. I know that much of the Middle East today isn't tolerant, but they probably didn't want encorporate that in a Disney movie. Anyone could see that Aladdin was under a huge amount of lighting. The list and the person in charge of it does lose most of his legitmacy for doing something like that.



While the comment about their skin color is obviously offensive, I think that the reason behind why Native Americans ask "How?" and the clothings with feathers are big stereotypes that Native Americans have issues with, which I find completely understandable. This was kind of an unusual list with some flaws, but there are some points that are still valid, like the Fantasia issue and that horrible movie The Song of the South.
 
AThe main problem I have with lists like these is that they confuse stereotypes with racism assuming they mean the same thing. While stereotypes can be attributed to racism, most of them merely stem from ignorance or common association.

Also, what I found funny was that Commando Duck wasn't on that list, even though a sizable amount of the short is spent showing them in a negative light and as untrustworthy slobs.

Of that list, only "Sunflower" and "Thursday" seems to have a hint of racist intent. Although "Thursday," while drawn in a now very unpopular characature, is more simplistic rather than racist. It's pretty much the same premise as Jungle 2 Jungle or common Mickey premises like Mickey and the Seal. It's more of his supposedly primitive upbringing rather than his ethnicity that makes him seem more like a lost puppy in that story.

Stuff like the those siamese cats pretty much fall under the "cheap joke stereotype." Sort of like British characatures that have huge noses and extreme overbites drinking tea and saying "cheerio" all the time. The Indians fall into the similar camp: a product of the hundreds of westerns popular in Hollywood and on television.

I have a very hard time finding Remus or the crows racist, mainly considering how they are some of the most positive and enlightening characters in their respective films. The association of blacks with crows never really bothered me, probably because it was used well in Fritz the Cat; it seems more like a dated stereotype than anything malicious. The criticism of historical accuracy in Song of the South is valid, but a bit silly when used as proof of racism. It was made at the height of the "classic Hollywood era," which were more geared toward positive moral messages and happy endings rather than historical accuracy. I highly doubt they had an agenda to rewrite history.

Don't really get the King Louie lynch, since his personality is pretty close to Balloo (whose conveniently not mentioned), except that Balloo has slightly better moral fiber.

The guy was apperently not paying attention to the story, since as far as I could tell, Sebastian begain his music number because he was concerned with Ariel's well being on the surface and wanted to convince her that the surface wasn't as great as she thinks. I kind of doubt there was any intent to spread some kind of hobo philosophy. The "blackfish" is indeed a dated characature that I'm surprised to see in the film, I will admit, although on a purely character design basis.

The Aladdin merchant was is really just some old codger with an accent trying to sell the viewer his merchendise/tell a story than anything. Those lyrics are likely pretty accurate given the medievel setting, though their ommission is competely understandable

While these stereotypes (especially in Disney productions) are in bad taste today, I think it's a stretch to consider the much of these listed here truely racist--just ignorant.
 
But do the Asians and the Indians find these "cheap jokes" funny?



:confused:




Baloo is a bear and he doesn't act like any stereotype I know.



He was really talking about the lyrics and offensive characters.



Elaborate please.



Agreed.
 
Cracked... hmm... wasn't that Mad Magazine's unfunny clone? I remember buying a whole bunch and when they did movie parodies, they just made fun of the trailer....

Anyway, I agree with everything except Louie. That is over thinking. If it was considered racist, I don't think Louis Prima would have done it. Definately not. I never even got the connection between African Americans and Monkeys. Some of this list seemed to be overthinking for the sake of overthinking to make lousy jokes...
 
People really don't know their history concerning the Middle East. It sucks there today due to England causing all sorts of crazy border problems and putting unlikable people in control, but in the middle ages, it was considered the height of civilization. They continued evolving Greco-Roman ideas and technology while much of Europe had gone backwards. They certainly treated Jews and Christians better than the Church treated Jews and Muslims.

You know, it bugs me how much people let Indian stereotypes slide while other ethnic minorities are always defended. I mean, you don't see any teams called the Washington N*****s or anything.
 
I own Song of the South and I find nothing wrong with it. and the list didn't give any clear arguments to convince me other wise. I don't see anything wrong with people doing their jobs, getting on with their lives, and getting along with one another. The film has nothing to do with what color skin somebody has. its about a little boy how misses his father and looks up to Uncle Remus as a father figure. and the film honors the treasured tales of Brother Rabbit.
 
Two things I find surprising about this list:
1) Banzai and Shenzi, the hyenas from The Lion King, did not make the list. When the movie came out, Disney got roundly criticized for making these flunky characters too "ghetto".
2) Uncle Remus wasn't #1. They had to dig deep and look hard to find something they considered worse.

Other than that, the list is extremely predictable and as pointless as this sort of "essay" gets. Never mind that it is riddled with inaccuracies:
--King Louie was based on - and played by - a white singer, Louie Prima, who was also parodied by Robin Williams in Happy Feet.
--Re: Aladdin's light skin. Not all Arabs are dark skinned and not all have Semitic features. Baghdad - the film's locale - is in Iraq, a nation which has a historically high percentage of light-skinned, non-Semitic Arabs living in it.
--The offensive lyrics in the same film, "Where they cut off your ear if they don't like your face. It's barbaric, but, hey, it's home." So inaccurate, because we all know that the Arab-Muslim world is just slopping over with peace and kindness and brotherhood and nobody there would ever commit such an act of violence. Thank God that schoolteacher who let her students name a teddy bear Mohommed escaped from the prison where she was being held. Forget her ear, she was about to lose her entire head! Nothin' barbaric here, folks, move along, move along.

Cracked.com actually has some pretty funny list articles on it, but this one is a misfire.
 
Do you realize your applying present-day politics to a completely different era?



From what I can tell, Song of the South isn't racist, but it's stupid revisionist history that completely ignores the existence of racism. Same sort of crap as them giving Pocahontas a happy ending.



Um, plenty of other minorities protest stuff and such. Native Americans seem to be shoved aside while other complaints get press for some reason.
 
Back
Top